Iuliano Sarah, Senn Laurence, Moi Laura, Muller Yannick D, Ribi Camillo, Buss Guillaume, Comte Denis
Service of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Front Allergy. 2022 Apr 8;3:853587. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.853587. eCollection 2022.
Beta-lactam allergy is a common problem in everyday medical practice and is recognized as a major public health issue. Carrying this label frequently leads to the avoidance of all beta-lactam antibiotics, favoring the use of other less preferred classes of antibiotics, that are more expensive and associated with more side effects and increased antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, delabeling a beta-lactam allergy is part of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Herein, we retrospectively examined the clinical records of 576 patients who were referred to our center for a label of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics and were systematically investigated following a standardized algorithm. Our main aim was to evaluate the frequency of confirmed immediate- and delayed-type allergy to commonly prescribed subclasses of beta-lactam antibiotics (penicillin and cephalosporin), as well as the negative predictive value (NPV) and the sensitivity of skin tests. Our secondary aims were to examine the safety of beta-lactam skin testing and drug challenge. We identified that 260 patients reported a history of immediate reactions, 131 of delayed reactions, and 114 of unknown timing or mechanism of reactions. Following assessment and testing, 86 (18.3%) patients had a confirmed allergy to any beta-lactam antibiotics; 63 (13.4%) with an immediate- and 23 (4.9%) with a delayed-type reaction. Most frequently identified confirmed allergy was to penicillins (65 patients), followed by cephalosporins (21 patients). When immediate-type reactions were examined, NPV of skin tests were 96.3% and 100% for penicillins and cephalosporins, respectively. When delayed reactions were considered, NPV were 91.9 and 87.5% for penicillins and cephalosporins, respectively. Evaluation of the safety of skin tests according to the standardized procedure showed that systemic allergic reactions occurred in only 0.7% of skin tests and in 3.1% of drug challenges. Overall, our data indicate that only 18.3% of patients with a beta-lactam allergy label have a confirmed allergy and non-allergic patients can be safely delabeled through allergic workup based on skin tests and drug challenge. This approach supports the policy of saving second-line antibiotics through a standardized allergy workup.
β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏是日常医疗实践中的常见问题,并且被视为一个重大的公共卫生问题。携带此标签常常导致避免使用所有β-内酰胺类抗生素,转而使用其他不太优选的抗生素类别,这些抗生素更昂贵且伴有更多副作用以及增加的抗菌药物耐药性。因此,去除β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏标签是抗菌药物管理计划的一部分。在此,我们回顾性检查了576例因β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏标签而转诊至我们中心的患者的临床记录,并按照标准化算法进行了系统调查。我们的主要目的是评估对常用的β-内酰胺类抗生素亚类(青霉素和头孢菌素)确诊的速发型和迟发型过敏的发生率,以及皮肤试验的阴性预测值(NPV)和敏感性。我们的次要目的是检查β-内酰胺类皮肤试验和药物激发试验的安全性。我们发现,260例患者报告有速发反应史,131例有迟发反应史,114例反应时间或机制不明。经过评估和检测,86例(18.3%)患者确诊对任何β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏;63例(13.4%)为速发型反应,23例(4.9%)为迟发型反应。最常确诊的过敏是对青霉素(65例患者),其次是头孢菌素(21例患者)。当检查速发型反应时,青霉素和头孢菌素皮肤试验的NPV分别为96.3%和100%。当考虑迟发反应时,青霉素和头孢菌素的NPV分别为91.9%和87.5%。根据标准化程序对皮肤试验安全性的评估表明,全身过敏反应仅发生在0.7%的皮肤试验和3.1%的药物激发试验中。总体而言,我们的数据表明,只有18.3%带有β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏标签的患者确诊过敏,非过敏患者可通过基于皮肤试验和药物激发试验的过敏检查安全地去除标签。这种方法支持通过标准化过敏检查节省二线抗生素的政策。