Groen Jesse Vincent, Boon S C, Minderhoud M W, Bonsing Bert A, Martini C H, Putter H, Vahrmeijer A L, van Velzen Monique, Vuijk J, Mieog J S D, Dahan A
Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Pain Res. 2022 Jun 22;15:1775-1786. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S363545. eCollection 2022.
The optimal treatment strategy for postoperative pain following pancreatoduodenectomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sublingual sufentanil tablet (SST) is a non-inferior analgesic compared to our standard-of-care (patient-controlled epidural analgesia [PCEA] or PCA morphine) in the treatment of pain following pancreatoduodenectomy.
This was a pragmatic, strategy, open-label, non-inferiority, parallel group, randomized (1:1) trial. The primary outcome was an overall mean pain score (Numerical Rating Scale: 0-10) on postoperative days 1 to 3 combined. The non-inferiority margin was -1.5 since this difference was considered clinically relevant.
Between October 2018 and July 2021, 190 patients were assessed for eligibility and 36 patients were included in the final analysis: 17 patients were randomized to SST and 19 patients to standard-of-care. Early treatment failure in the SST group occurred in 2 patients (12%) due to inability to operate the SST system and in 2 patients (12%) due to severe nausea despite antiemetics. Early treatment failure in the standard-of-care group occurred in 2 patients (11%) due to preoperative PCEA placement failure and in 1 patient (5%) due to hemodynamic instability caused by PCEA. The mean difference in pain score on postoperative day 1 to 3 was -0.10 (95% CI -0.72-0.52), and therefore the non-inferiority of SST compared to standard-of-care was demonstrated. The mean pain score, number of patients reporting unacceptable pain (pain score >4), Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score, and patient satisfaction per postoperative day, perioperative hemodynamics and postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.
This first randomized study investigating the use of SST in 36 patients following pancreatoduodenectomy showed that SST is non-inferior compared to our standard-of-care in the treatment of pain on postoperative days 1 to 3. Future research is needed to confirm that these findings are applicable to other settings.
胰十二指肠切除术后疼痛的最佳治疗策略仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨在胰十二指肠切除术后疼痛治疗中,舌下含服舒芬太尼片(SST)与我们的标准治疗方法(患者自控硬膜外镇痛[PCEA]或PCA吗啡)相比是否为非劣效性镇痛药物。
这是一项务实的、策略性的、开放标签的、非劣效性的、平行组随机(1:1)试验。主要结局是术后第1至3天的总体平均疼痛评分(数字评分量表:0至10)。非劣效性界值为-1.5,因为该差异被认为具有临床相关性。
2018年10月至2021年7月期间,190例患者接受了资格评估,36例患者纳入最终分析:17例患者随机分配至SST组,19例患者分配至标准治疗组。SST组有2例患者(12%)因无法操作SST系统以及2例患者(12%)尽管使用了止吐药仍出现严重恶心而导致早期治疗失败。标准治疗组有2例患者(11%)因术前PCEA置管失败以及1例患者(5%)因PCEA导致血流动力学不稳定而出现早期治疗失败。术后第1至3天疼痛评分的平均差异为-0.10(95%CI -0.72至0.52),因此证明了SST与标准治疗相比具有非劣效性。两组之间术后每日的平均疼痛评分、报告疼痛不可接受的患者数量(疼痛评分>4)、镇痛总体效益评分、患者满意度、围手术期血流动力学和术后结局均无显著差异。
这项对36例胰十二指肠切除术后患者使用SST的首次随机研究表明,在术后第1至3天的疼痛治疗中,SST与我们的标准治疗相比具有非劣效性。需要进一步研究以证实这些发现适用于其他情况。