Myers D V
J Pers Assess. 1978 Aug;42(4):358-65. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4204_5.
The feasibility of employing a quantitative scoring procedure for evaluating the Kinetic Family Drawings (KFD) was examined. A quantitative scoring procedure was developed from the clinical hypotheses Burns and Kaufman (1970, 1972) to score 21 measurable KFD styles, actions, and characteristics. The scoring procedure was employed to evaluate 116 KFDs obtained from four groups of boys to determine the effectiveness of the procedure to differentiate among two levels of emotional adjustment and the two levels of age. The results indicated that four of seven sets of extracted component scores significantly differed between the emotionally well-adjusted and the emotionally disturbed groups. One set of component scores significantly differed between the younger and the older groups, while two sets of component scores did not differ among any of the four groups. The KFD total score was found to differ significantly only between the young emotionally disturbed and the young emotionally well-adjusted groups. It was concluded that a quantitative scoring procedure for the KFD is feasible.
研究了采用定量评分程序评估动态家庭绘画（KFD）的可行性。基于伯恩斯和考夫曼（1970年、1972年）的临床假设开发了一种定量评分程序，用于对21种可测量的KFD风格、动作和特征进行评分。该评分程序用于评估从四组男孩中获得的116幅KFD，以确定该程序区分两种情绪调节水平和两个年龄组的有效性。结果表明，在情绪调节良好组和情绪困扰组之间，七组提取的成分得分中有四组存在显著差异。一组成分得分在较年轻组和较年长组之间存在显著差异，而两组成分得分在四组中的任何一组之间均无差异。发现KFD总分仅在年轻情绪困扰组和年轻情绪调节良好组之间存在显著差异。得出结论，KFD的定量评分程序是可行的。
