Department of Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Jun 30;28(4):30. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00382-5.
Research integrity climate is an important factor that influences an individual's behavior. A strong research integrity culture can lead to better research practices and responsible conduct of research (RCR). Therefore, investigations on organizational climate can be a valuable tool to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each group and develop targeted initiatives. This study aims to assess the perceptions on integrity climate in three universities in Hungary. A cross-sectional study was conducted with PhD students, postdocs, and professors from three Hungarian universities. The survey included demographic questions, such as gender, age, scientific field, academic rank, and the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SOURCE). A total of 432 participants completed the survey. Our results show that postdocs and assistant professors perceived integrity climate more negatively than PhD students and full professors in every survey scale. Contrarily, PhD students perceive more positively than the other groups. Disciplinary differences show that researchers in the Biomedical sciences perceive regulatory bodies to be fairer when evaluating their projects than those in the Natural sciences. Natural sciences also perceive more negatively how the department values integrity when compared to Humanities. Humanities perceive more positively Advisor/Advisee Relations than Biomedical Sciences. Our results suggest that institutions should pay more attention to early career researchers, especially insecure and temporary positions like postdocs and assistant professors. They should provide RCR resources, socialize them in RCR, and set more reasonable expectations. Moreover, department leaders should develop initiatives to foster better integrity climates.
研究诚信风气是影响个体行为的一个重要因素。强大的研究诚信文化可以促进更好的研究实践和负责任的研究行为(RCR)。因此,对组织风气的调查可以成为识别每个群体的优势和劣势并制定有针对性举措的宝贵工具。本研究旨在评估匈牙利三所大学的诚信风气感知。采用横断面研究,对三所匈牙利大学的博士生、博士后和教授进行了调查。该调查包括人口统计学问题,如性别、年龄、学科、学术职称和组织研究风气调查(SOURCE)。共有 432 名参与者完成了调查。我们的研究结果表明,在每个调查量表中,博士后和助理教授比博士生和正教授对诚信风气的感知更为负面。相反,博士生比其他群体对诚信风气的感知更为正面。学科差异表明,与自然科学相比,生物医学科学的研究人员在评估项目时认为监管机构更公平。自然科学也对部门对诚信的重视程度评价更为负面。人文科学比生物医学科学更正面地看待导师/指导关系。我们的研究结果表明,各机构应更加关注早期职业研究人员,尤其是临时工,如博士后和助理教授。他们应该提供 RCR 资源,让他们了解 RCR,并设定更合理的期望。此外,部门领导应该制定举措,培养更好的诚信风气。