• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿姆斯特丹感知的出版压力:所有学科领域和学术级别的调查。

Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0217931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217931. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0217931
PMID:31216293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6583945/
Abstract

Publications determine to a large extent the possibility to stay in academia ("publish or perish"). While some pressure to publish may incentivise high quality research, too much publication pressure is likely to have detrimental effects on both the scientific enterprise and on individual researchers. Our research question was: What is the level of perceived publication pressure in the four academic institutions in Amsterdam and does the pressure to publish differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields? Investigating researchers in Amsterdam with the revised Publication Pressure Questionnaire, we find that a negative attitude towards the current publication climate is present across academic ranks and disciplinary fields. Postdocs and assistant professors (M = 3.42) perceive the greatest publication stress and PhD-students (M = 2.44) perceive a significant lack of resources to relieve publication stress. Results indicate the need for a healthier publication climate where the quality and integrity of research is rewarded.

摘要

出版物在很大程度上决定了一个人留在学术界的可能性(“不发表就出局”)。虽然发表论文的压力可能会激励高质量的研究,但过多的发表压力可能会对科学事业和个人研究人员产生不利影响。我们的研究问题是:在阿姆斯特丹的四所学术机构中,人们感受到的发表压力有多大,发表压力在学术级别和学科领域之间是否存在差异?我们用修订后的《发表压力问卷》调查了阿姆斯特丹的研究人员,发现对当前发表氛围的负面态度在学术级别和学科领域都存在。博士后和助理教授(M=3.42)感受到了最大的发表压力,博士生(M=2.44)则明显感到缺乏缓解发表压力的资源。研究结果表明,需要建立一个更健康的发表环境,奖励研究的质量和诚信。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f97/6583945/bdfa5c2117b9/pone.0217931.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f97/6583945/b504d5215974/pone.0217931.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f97/6583945/b398bb8bf4a2/pone.0217931.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f97/6583945/bdfa5c2117b9/pone.0217931.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f97/6583945/b504d5215974/pone.0217931.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f97/6583945/b398bb8bf4a2/pone.0217931.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f97/6583945/bdfa5c2117b9/pone.0217931.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks.阿姆斯特丹感知的出版压力:所有学科领域和学术级别的调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0217931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217931. eCollection 2019.
2
Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam.学术研究人员在科研诚信氛围方面的感知因学术等级和学科领域而异:来自阿姆斯特丹学术研究人员调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):e0210599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210599. eCollection 2019.
3
Perceptions of publication pressure among Hungarian researchers: Differences across career stage, gender, and scientific field.匈牙利研究人员对发表压力的看法:不同职业阶段、性别和科学领域的差异。
Account Res. 2023 Dec;30(8):766-775. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2081917. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
4
Perceptions of Research Integrity Climate in Hungarian Universities: Results from A Survey among Academic Researchers.匈牙利大学科研诚信氛围的认知:一项针对学术研究人员的调查结果。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Jun 30;28(4):30. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00382-5.
5
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived publication pressure among academic researchers in Canada.COVID-19 大流行对加拿大学术研究人员感知到的发表压力的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0269743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269743. eCollection 2022.
6
Researchers' perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam.研究人员对研究不当行为的认知:一项针对阿姆斯特丹学术研究人员的混合方法研究。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Dec 2;4:25. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0081-7. eCollection 2019.
7
Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.可疑研究行为、研究不端行为及其潜在解释因素的流行程度:荷兰学术研究人员的调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 16;17(2):e0263023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263023. eCollection 2022.
8
Barriers to publishing in biomedical journals perceived by a sample of French researchers: results of the DIAzePAM study.法国研究人员样本所感知到的在生物医学期刊上发表文章的障碍:DIAzePAM研究结果
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0371-z.
9
Publication pressure and burn out among Dutch medical professors: a nationwide survey.荷兰医学教授的发表压力和倦怠:一项全国性调查。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 4;8(9):e73381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073381. eCollection 2013.
10
Publication activities of German junior researchers in academic medicine: which factors impact impact factors?德国青年研究人员在学术医学领域的发表活动:哪些因素影响影响因子?
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 25;16:190. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0712-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping 60 Years of Psychophysiology: A Bibliometric Analysis of Journal Performance, Authorship Trends, and Thematic Evolution.绘制60年心理生理学图谱:期刊表现、作者趋势和主题演变的文献计量分析
Psychophysiology. 2025 Feb;62(2):e70002. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70002.
2
Decisions, Decisions, Decisions: An Ethnographic Study of Researcher Discretion in Practice.决策,决策,决策:实践中研究人员裁量权的民族志研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Nov 29;30(6):59. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00481-5.
3
The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions.

本文引用的文献

1
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
2
Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models.个人感知的发表压力:运用工作压力模型修订发表压力问卷(PPQ)
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Apr 9;4:7. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0066-6. eCollection 2019.
3
Tenure denial, and how early-career researchers can survive it.tenure拒绝,以及早期职业研究人员如何在其中生存下来。 (注:“tenure”常见释义为“任期;终身职位”,这里结合语境可能是指在学术领域获得终身教职等类似情况的被拒绝,整体翻译可能需根据具体学科背景进一步优化表述,但按要求先给出此译文。)
大语言模型对医学写作与出版的变革性影响:当前应用、挑战及未来方向
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 1;28(5):393-401. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.5.393.
4
How does workplace support promote postdoctoral career growth? A conservation of resources perspective.工作场所支持如何促进博士后职业发展?基于资源保存理论的视角。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 25;15:1294982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1294982. eCollection 2024.
5
Copublication promotes dissemination hypertension guidelines: a retrospective cohort study.共同发表促进高血压指南传播:一项回顾性队列研究。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Feb;47(2):416-426. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01470-0. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
6
Validation of publication pressure questionnaire-revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital.中文护士版科研发表压力问卷的信效度检验。
Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7713-7724. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2012. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
7
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews.引用更新的和共同发表的 Cochrane 方法学评论。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 14;12(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02270-w.
8
"My Cross-Border PhD Journey": A Qualitative Study on the Educational and Life Challenges of Mainland Chinese PhD Students in Hong Kong.“我的跨境博士之旅”:对在港内地博士生教育和生活挑战的质性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 7;20(12):6078. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126078.
9
Essential signals in publication trends and collaboration patterns in global Research Integrity and Research Ethics (RIRE).全球研究诚信与研究伦理(RIRE)领域出版趋势和合作模式中的关键信号。
Scientometrics. 2022;127(12):7487-7497. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04400-y. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
10
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived publication pressure among academic researchers in Canada.COVID-19 大流行对加拿大学术研究人员感知到的发表压力的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0269743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269743. eCollection 2022.
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7740):525-527. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00219-5.
4
Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam.学术研究人员在科研诚信氛围方面的感知因学术等级和学科领域而异:来自阿姆斯特丹学术研究人员调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):e0210599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210599. eCollection 2019.
5
Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity.对主要和次要研究不当行为进行排名:来自四次世界研究诚信大会参与者的调查结果。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Nov 21;1:17. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5. eCollection 2016.
6
The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science.创造了指标并改变了科学的目录。
Nature. 2017 Nov 8;551(7679):163-165. doi: 10.1038/551163a.
7
How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?如果政府竞争性研究资金在研究人员中平均分配,每位研究人员将获得多少资金?
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0183967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183967. eCollection 2017.
8
How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers.科学家如何看待当前的出版文化?一项针对荷兰生物医学研究人员的定性焦点小组访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 17;6(2):e008681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008681.
9
Improving response rates and evaluating nonresponse bias in surveys: AMEE Guide No. 102.提高调查的回应率并评估无回应偏差:AMEE指南第102号
Med Teach. 2016;38(3):217-28. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1105945. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
The Inherent Drawbacks of the Pressure to Publish in Health Sciences: Good or Bad Science.健康科学领域发表压力的内在弊端:科学好坏与否
F1000Res. 2015 Jul 29;4:419. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6809.2. eCollection 2015.