Pneumology Group, Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China; Laboratory of Pulmonary Immunology and Inflammation, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Pneumology Group, Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Respir Med. 2022 Aug-Sep;200:106924. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106924. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
Given that airway obstruction in asthma is not always fully reversible, reduced bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) may be a special asthma phenotype.
To explore the characteristics of BDR phenotypes (defined using two BDR criteria) and their associations with asthma exacerbations (AEs).
After baseline assessments, all patients were classified into BDR or BDR phenotypes. This study consisted of 2 parts. Part I was a 12-month prospective observational cohort study designed to identify the clinical characteristics and associations with future AEs in BDR phenotypes (n = 456). Part II, designed as a post hoc analysis of the data obtained in Part I, was conducted to assess the association between BDR phenotypes and treatment responsiveness (n = 360).
Subjects with BDR phenotypes had better baseline asthma symptom control and was negatively associated with eosinophilic asthma and type 2 (T2) high asthma. During the 12-month follow-up, those with BDR phenotypes had a higher risk of severe AEs (SAEs) (guideline-based criterion: RR = 2.24, 95% CI = [1.25, 3.68]; Ward's criterion: RR = 2.46, 95% CI = [1.40, 4.00]) and moderate-to-severe AEs (MSAEs) (guideline-based criterion: RR = 1.83, 95% CI = [1.22, 2.56]; Ward's criterion: RR = 1.94, 95% CI = [1.32, 2.68]) in the following year according to logistic regression models. Similar findings were obtained with negative binominal regression models. BDR phenotype was a risk factor for an insensitive response to anti-asthma treatment (guideline-based criterion: OR = 1.96, 95% CI = [1.05, 3.65]; Ward's criterion: OR = 2.01, 95% CI = [1.12, 3.58]).
We identified that BDR phenotype was associated with non-T2 high asthma and future AEs. These findings have clinically relevant implications for asthma management.
由于哮喘的气道阻塞并非总是完全可逆,因此,支气管扩张剂可逆性降低(BDR)可能是一种特殊的哮喘表型。
探讨两种 BDR 标准定义的 BDR 表型的特征及其与哮喘加重(AE)的关系。
在基线评估后,所有患者均被分为 BDR 或 BDR 表型。本研究包括 2 部分。第 1 部分是为期 12 个月的前瞻性观察队列研究,旨在确定 BDR 表型患者的临床特征及其与未来 AE 的关系(n=456)。第 2 部分是对第 1 部分数据的事后分析,旨在评估 BDR 表型与治疗反应性之间的关系(n=360)。
BDR 表型患者具有更好的基线哮喘症状控制,且与嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘和 2 型高气道炎症(T2HA)呈负相关。在 12 个月的随访期间,BDR 表型患者发生严重 AE(SAE)(基于指南的标准:RR=2.24,95%CI=[1.25,3.68];Ward 标准:RR=2.46,95%CI=[1.40,4.00])和中重度 AE(MSAE)(基于指南的标准:RR=1.83,95%CI=[1.22,2.56];Ward 标准:RR=1.94,95%CI=[1.32,2.68])的风险更高。根据逻辑回归模型,在随后的一年中也观察到了类似的发现。负二项回归模型也得到了相似的结果。BDR 表型是对哮喘治疗反应不敏感的危险因素(基于指南的标准:OR=1.96,95%CI=[1.05,3.65];Ward 标准:OR=2.01,95%CI=[1.12,3.58])。
我们发现 BDR 表型与非 T2HA 哮喘和未来 AE 有关。这些发现对哮喘管理具有临床意义。