Suppr超能文献

为新诊断为急性髓系白血病的老年患者选择强化和非强化一线治疗方法。

Choosing between intensive and less intensive front-line treatment approaches for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia.

机构信息

Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Haematol. 2022 Jul;9(7):e535-e545. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00167-3.

Abstract

The outcomes of older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia are inferior to their younger counterparts, because, in part, of a more aggressive disease biology and poorer tolerance of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Although intensive chemotherapy was historically considered the only effective treatment for these patients, many older patients are not suitable for intensive chemotherapy owing to comorbidities or general frailty. Determination of patient fitness for intensive chemotherapy is imperfect, and even older patients who appear to be suitable (also known as fit) for intensive chemotherapy can have high rates of morbidity and early and late mortality with this approach. Fortunately, the outcomes of older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukaemia have substantially improved with the use of a hypomethylating agent plus venetoclax in the front-line setting. Although the formal approval of this combination is limited to patients aged 75 years or older, or those with a clinically significant comorbidity, the high response rates and survival improvement in these patients have led many practitioners to consider this low-intensity regimen in older patients without significant comorbidities and even in younger patients with high-risk disease features for whom the expected outcomes with intensive chemotherapy are poor. Modifications to the hypomethylating agent plus venetoclax backbone might further improve the outlook for these patients, particularly in some acute myeloid leukaemia subsets with a targetable mutation. In this Viewpoint, we review the retrospective and prospective data supporting both intensive chemotherapy and low-intensity venetoclax-based approaches in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. We also discuss our own approach to the management of older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, including how cytomolecular features have a role in establishing the optimal front-line therapy.

摘要

老年急性髓系白血病患者的预后不如年轻患者,部分原因是疾病生物学更具侵袭性,对细胞毒性化疗的耐受性更差。尽管强化化疗在历史上被认为是这些患者唯一有效的治疗方法,但由于合并症或一般虚弱,许多老年患者不适合强化化疗。对强化化疗患者的身体状况评估并不完善,即使那些看起来适合(也称为 fit)强化化疗的老年患者,采用这种方法也会出现高发病率、早期和晚期死亡率。幸运的是,在一线治疗中使用低甲基化剂联合 venetoclax 显著改善了老年或不适合化疗的急性髓系白血病患者的预后。尽管该联合方案的正式批准仅限于 75 岁或以上的患者,或有临床意义合并症的患者,但这些患者的高缓解率和生存改善促使许多医生考虑在没有明显合并症的老年患者中使用这种低强度方案,甚至在具有高风险疾病特征、强化化疗预期结果不佳的年轻患者中也考虑这种方案。对低甲基化剂加 venetoclax 骨干方案的修改可能会进一步改善这些患者的前景,特别是在一些具有可靶向突变的急性髓系白血病亚组中。在本观点中,我们回顾了支持老年急性髓系白血病患者进行强化化疗和低强度 venetoclax 为基础的治疗的回顾性和前瞻性数据。我们还讨论了我们自己对老年或不适合化疗的急性髓系白血病患者的管理方法,包括细胞分子特征在确定最佳一线治疗中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验