Suppr超能文献

90天一次性使用软性膀胱镜试验的成本效益:单中心微观成本分析与用户满意度

Cost-Effectiveness of 90-day Single-use Flexible Cystoscope Trial: Single Center Micro-Costing Analysis and User Satisfaction.

作者信息

Assmus Mark A, Krambeck Amy E, Lee Matt S, Agarwal Deepak K, Mellon Matthew, Rivera Marcelino E, Large Tim

机构信息

Northwestern University, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL.

Northwestern University, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Urology. 2022 Sep;167:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.05.039. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cost-effectiveness and user satisfaction of a single-use flexible cystoscope at a tertiary care center we conducted a 90-day trial. Single-use flexible cystoscope advancements have introduced alternative options to reusable scopes. However, there is a paucity of cost-effectiveness and provider satisfaction studies examining the implementation of a hospital-based transition to single-use cystoscopes.

METHODS

Following institutional device-approval we initiated a 90-day trial period (November 1, 2020-January 29, 2021) where all flexible, transurethral, and percutaneous, urologic care was provided with a disposable AMBU aScope. We performed a micro-costing analysis examining payor per case cost of the reusable flexible cystoscope (including servicing and processing) to the disposable units. Provider surveys assessed visual quality, deflection, ease of working channel and overall satisfaction on a 10-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Over the 90-day period, we encountered 84 cases (78 operative, 5 inpatient, 1 emergency department) where flexible cystoscopy was required. One disposable flexible cystoscope was successfully used in 78 of 84 (93%) cases. Of the 6 failures, 2 were due to an inability to access a disposable scope/monitor. Per use cost of the reusable flexible cystoscope at our center was $272.41 versus $185.00 for the single use. Extrapolating our average case volume and conservative failure rate (3 single use failures/month, requiring reusable), transitioning to predominately single use scopes results in $39,142.84 annual cost savings.

CONCLUSIONS

This single center 90-day trial of disposable flexible cystoscopy identified per-use costs to be less when a single-use flexible cystoscope was utilized at a high-volume tertiary care center.

摘要

目的

为评估一次性使用软性膀胱镜在一家三级医疗中心的成本效益和用户满意度,我们进行了一项为期90天的试验。一次性使用软性膀胱镜的进展为可重复使用的膀胱镜引入了替代选择。然而,关于医院向一次性使用膀胱镜过渡实施情况的成本效益和提供者满意度研究较少。

方法

在机构设备批准后,我们启动了一个为期90天的试验期(2020年11月1日至2021年1月29日),在此期间,所有软性、经尿道和经皮的泌尿外科护理均使用一次性的AMBU aScope。我们进行了微观成本分析,比较了可重复使用软性膀胱镜(包括维修和处理)与一次性装置的每个病例支付者成本。提供者调查使用10分制李克特量表评估视觉质量、偏转、工作通道易用性和总体满意度。

结果

在90天期间,我们遇到84例需要进行软性膀胱镜检查的病例(78例手术病例、5例住院病例、1例急诊科病例)。84例中的78例(93%)成功使用了一根一次性软性膀胱镜。在6次失败中,2次是由于无法获得一次性膀胱镜/显示器。我们中心可重复使用软性膀胱镜的每次使用成本为272.41美元,而一次性使用的成本为185.00美元。根据我们的平均病例数量和保守的失败率(每月3次一次性使用失败,需要使用可重复使用的膀胱镜)推算,向主要使用一次性膀胱镜过渡每年可节省成本39,142.84美元。

结论

这项针对一次性软性膀胱镜检查的单中心90天试验表明,在高容量的三级医疗中心使用一次性软性膀胱镜时,每次使用成本更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验