Planned Parenthood of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States.
Planned Parenthood of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States; Rush University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chicago, IL, United States.
Contraception. 2022 Nov;115:62-66. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
To determine the proportion of complete abortion without surgical intervention for patients who chose medication abortion with vaginal compared to buccal misoprostol following oral mifepristone through 70 days of gestation.
We performed a retrospective cohort study. We reviewed charts via electronic medical record data abstraction of patients receiving medication abortion with mifepristone and buccal or vaginal misoprostol between September 1, 2017 and August 1, 2019. Primary outcome was complete abortion without surgical intervention for any indication. Secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy and uterine aspiration for indications other than ongoing pregnancy.
There were 14,504 encounters included in the data set. Of the 4814 patients who took vaginal misoprostol and the 4011 patients who took buccal misoprostol for whom follow up data is available, 4640 (96.4%) and 3917 (97.7%) had a complete abortion without surgical intervention, respectively (p = 0.002). At <64 days of gestation, complete abortion was 96.6% for vaginal administration compared to 98.0% for buccal (p = 0.001). At 64 to 70 days of gestation, complete abortion was 92.7% for vaginal administration compared to 93.2% for buccal (p = 0.08). Of the 1128 patients who took vaginal misoprostol at less than 6 hours after mifepristone, 95.3% experienced a complete abortion.
Buccal administration of misoprostol is associated with a higher proportion of complete abortion before 64 days of gestation compared to vaginal misoprostol. Clinically, vaginal misoprostol is an effective route of administration through 70 days of gestation.
Medication abortion with vaginal misoprostol is effective when administered through 70 days of gestation and with shorter intervals between mifepristone and misoprostol. Prospective research to better estimate effectiveness is warranted. Expanding medication abortion options promotes patient autonomy amid increasing restrictions and bans on abortion.
确定在妊娠 70 天内,与口服米非司酮后阴道给予米索前列醇相比,口服米非司酮后经阴道或颊黏膜给予米索前列醇的患者,无需手术干预即可完全流产的比例。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们通过电子病历数据提取,回顾了 2017 年 9 月 1 日至 2019 年 8 月 1 日期间接受米非司酮联合阴道或颊黏膜米索前列醇药物流产的患者的图表。主要结局为任何原因无需手术干预即可完全流产。次要结局为因其他原因而非持续妊娠而行子宫抽吸术。
数据集共包括 14504 例就诊。在接受阴道米索前列醇治疗的 4814 例患者和接受颊黏膜米索前列醇治疗的 4011 例患者中,分别有 4640(96.4%)例和 3917(97.7%)例无需手术干预即可完全流产(p=0.002)。妊娠<64 天者,阴道给药完全流产率为 96.6%,颊黏膜给药为 98.0%(p=0.001)。妊娠 64-70 天者,阴道给药完全流产率为 92.7%,颊黏膜给药为 93.2%(p=0.08)。在 1128 例于米非司酮后<6 小时接受阴道米索前列醇治疗的患者中,95.3%发生完全流产。
与阴道米索前列醇相比,妊娠<64 天者经颊黏膜给予米索前列醇可获得更高比例的完全流产。临床研究表明,阴道米索前列醇在妊娠 70 天内是一种有效的给药途径。
妊娠 70 天内阴道给予米索前列醇,且米非司酮与米索前列醇间隔时间较短,药物流产有效。需要开展前瞻性研究以更好地评估其有效性。扩大药物流产的选择范围可促进患者自主权,因为目前对堕胎的限制和禁令越来越多。