Suppr超能文献

膝关节置换术与关节牵伸术治疗骨关节炎的临床和成本效益比较(KARDS):一项多中心、三期、随机对照试验方案。

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of Knee Arthroplasty versus Joint Distraction for Osteoarthritis (KARDS): protocol for a multicentre, phase III, randomised control trial.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 30;12(6):e062721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062721.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Knee replacement (KR) is a clinically proven procedure typically offered to patients with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA) to relieve pain and improve quality of life. However, artificial joints fail over time, requiring revision associated with higher mortality and inferior outcomes. With more young people presenting with knee OA and increasing life expectancy, there is an unmet need to postpone time to first KR. Knee joint distraction (KJD), the practice of using external fixators to open up knee joint space, is proposed as potentially effective to preserve the joint following initial studies in the Netherlands, however, has not been researched within an NHS setting. The KARDS trial will investigate whether KJD is non-inferior to KR in terms of patient-reported postoperative pain 12 months post-surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

KARDS is a phase III, multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, individually randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing KJD with KR in patients with severe knee OA, employing a hybrid-expertise design, with internal pilot phase and process evaluation. 344 participants will be randomised (1:1) to KJD or KR. The primary outcome measure is the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) pain domain score at 12 months post-operation. Secondary outcome measures include patient-reported overall KOOS, Pain Visual Analogue Scale and Oxford Knee Scores, knee function assessments, joint space width, complications and further interventions over 24 months post-operation. Per patient cost difference between KR and KJD and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained over 24 months will be estimated within trial, and incremental cost per QALY gained over 20 years by KJD relative to KR predicted using decision analytic modelling.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) and Health Research Authority (HRA). Trial results will be disseminated at clinical conferences, through relevant patient groups and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN14879004; recruitment opened April 2021.

摘要

简介

膝关节置换术(KR)是一种经临床证实的手术,通常用于治疗严重膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者,以缓解疼痛并提高生活质量。然而,人工关节会随着时间的推移而失效,需要进行翻修,这会导致更高的死亡率和更差的治疗效果。由于越来越多的年轻人出现膝关节 OA 以及预期寿命的延长,因此需要找到一种方法来延迟首次膝关节置换术的时间。膝关节牵张术(KJD),即使用外固定器来扩大膝关节间隙的方法,最初在荷兰进行的研究表明,该方法在保留关节方面可能具有潜在的效果,但尚未在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的环境中进行研究。KARDS 试验将研究在术后 12 个月时,KJD 在患者报告的术后疼痛方面是否不劣于 KR。

方法和分析

KARDS 是一项 III 期、多中心、实用性、开放标签、个体随机对照非劣效性试验,比较了严重膝关节 OA 患者中 KJD 与 KR 的疗效,采用混合专业知识设计,包括内部预试验和过程评估。将 344 名参与者随机分为 KJD 组(1:1)或 KR 组。主要结局测量指标是术后 12 个月时的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)疼痛量表评分。次要结局指标包括患者报告的整体 KOOS、疼痛视觉模拟量表和牛津膝关节评分、膝关节功能评估、关节间隙宽度、并发症以及术后 24 个月内的进一步干预措施。将在试验内估算 KR 和 KJD 的每位患者成本差异以及术后 24 个月内每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本,并使用决策分析模型预测 KJD 相对于 KR 在 20 年内每获得一个 QALY 的增量成本。

伦理和传播

该研究已获得研究伦理委员会(REC)和卫生研究管理局(HRA)的伦理批准。试验结果将在临床会议上进行传播,通过相关患者群体进行传播,并在同行评议期刊上发表。

试验注册号

ISRCTN84516335;招募于 2021 年 4 月开始。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验