Senior Scholar for Well-Being, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 401 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 2000, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2022 Oct;114(5):498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
After the murder of George Floyd, many professions, organizations, and institutions have begun to confront the long and persistent legacy of racism in the United States. Within that context, it is critically important for the medical education community to address the question of whether medical education is systemically racist, and if so, what should be done to address this problem. In this commentary, this author seeks to answer these questions, primarily by focusing on the role of standardized multiple-choice examinations in determining who gains admission to medical school and which medical students are then determined to be the best and the brightest. Analysis leads the author to the conclusion that medical education clearly meets the definition of systemic racism and that recent attempts to increase the racial and ethnic diversity of medical students have largely failed. The author then outlines a three-pronged approach to address this problem with interventions at the admissions, medical school, and graduate medical education levels.
乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)遇害后,许多专业、组织和机构开始正视美国由来已久且顽固的种族主义问题。在此背景下,医学教育界急需探讨医学教育是否存在系统性种族主义,如果是,应采取哪些措施来解决这一问题。本文主要围绕标准化多项选择题在决定谁有资格进入医学院以及哪些医学生会被认为是最优秀和最聪明的学生方面所起的作用来回答这些问题。分析后作者得出结论,医学教育显然符合系统性种族主义的定义,而且最近增加医学生种族和民族多样性的尝试基本上都失败了。随后,作者概述了一种三管齐下的方法,从招生、医学院和毕业后医学教育三个层面来解决这个问题。