• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视主动脉瓣钙化评分在评估日本患者主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度中的作用——一项单中心研究

Revisiting the Aortic Valve Calcium Score in Evaluating the Severity of Aortic Stenosis in Japanese Patients - A Single-Center Study.

作者信息

Katagiri Yuki, Yamasaki Kazumasa, Hatanaka Noriyuki, Bota Hiroki, Tani Tomoyuki, Koga Tomonori, Setogawa Yuki, Misawa Manabu, Ueda Takashi, Yamazaki Seiji

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital Sapporo Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital Sapporo Japan.

出版信息

Circ Rep. 2022 Apr 28;4(6):274-284. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0035. eCollection 2022 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0035
PMID:35774077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9168510/
Abstract

In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), measurement of aortic valve calcification (AVC) using computed tomography (CT) is recommended in cases where echocardiographic measurements are inconclusive. However, sex-specific AVC thresholds proposed in the guidelines for predicting severe AS (women: 1,200 arbitrary units [AU]; men: 2,000 AU) are based on studies from Western countries. We retrospectively included 512 Japanese patients with at least moderate AS who underwent transthoracic echocardiography and CT. AVC was quantified using the Agatston method. AVC was positively correlated with peak aortic jet velocity and mean transvalvular gradient (mPG), and negatively correlated with aortic valve area (AVA) and the AVA index (AVAi). In 257 patients with concordant AS grading (152 severe AS [AVAi ≤0.6 cm/m, mPG ≥40 mmHg], 105 moderate AS [AVAi >0.6 cm/m, mPG <40 mmHg]), receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of AVC predicting severe AS yielded an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.95; P<0.001) in women and 0.86 (95% CI 0.75-0.98; P<0.001) in men. The optimal thresholds (women: 1,379 AU; men: 1,802 AU) were close to those proposed in the guidelines. The diagnostic accuracy of the thresholds in the guidelines was similar to that of the optimal thresholds. The sex-specific AVC thresholds proposed in international guidelines can be applied to Japanese AS patients, yielding similar diagnostic accuracy as the optimal cut-off derived from the study patients.

摘要

在主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中,若超声心动图测量结果不明确,建议使用计算机断层扫描(CT)测量主动脉瓣钙化(AVC)。然而,预测重度AS的指南中提出的性别特异性AVC阈值(女性:1200任意单位[AU];男性:2000 AU)是基于西方国家的研究。我们回顾性纳入了512例至少为中度AS且接受经胸超声心动图和CT检查的日本患者。使用阿加斯顿方法对AVC进行量化。AVC与主动脉峰值射流速度和平均跨瓣压差(mPG)呈正相关,与主动脉瓣面积(AVA)和AVA指数(AVAi)呈负相关。在257例AS分级一致的患者中(152例重度AS[AVAi≤0.6 cm/m²,mPG≥40 mmHg],105例中度AS[AVAi>0.6 cm/m²,mPG<40 mmHg]),AVC预测重度AS的受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,女性曲线下面积为0.91(95%置信区间[CI] 0.87 - 0.95;P<0.001),男性为0.86(95%CI 0.75 - 0.98;P<0.001)。最佳阈值(女性:1379 AU;男性:1802 AU)与指南中提出的阈值相近。指南中阈值的诊断准确性与最佳阈值相似。国际指南中提出的性别特异性AVC阈值可应用于日本AS患者,诊断准确性与从研究患者得出的最佳截断值相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/5831dd261e58/circrep-4-274-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/818358320025/circrep-4-274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/0492231f2be3/circrep-4-274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/31c3f41d7654/circrep-4-274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/3484cf297460/circrep-4-274-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/5831dd261e58/circrep-4-274-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/818358320025/circrep-4-274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/0492231f2be3/circrep-4-274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/31c3f41d7654/circrep-4-274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/3484cf297460/circrep-4-274-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b4a/9168510/5831dd261e58/circrep-4-274-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Revisiting the Aortic Valve Calcium Score in Evaluating the Severity of Aortic Stenosis in Japanese Patients - A Single-Center Study.重新审视主动脉瓣钙化评分在评估日本患者主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度中的作用——一项单中心研究
Circ Rep. 2022 Apr 28;4(6):274-284. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0035. eCollection 2022 Jun 10.
2
The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.不和谐严重钙化主动脉瓣疾病分级的复杂性:联合多普勒超声心动图和计算机断层扫描研究的新见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
3
Validation of aortic valve calcium quantification thresholds measured by computed tomography in Asian patients with calcific aortic stenosis.经计算机断层扫描测量的主动脉瓣钙化定量阈值在亚洲钙化性主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的验证。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Apr 18;23(5):717-726. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab116.
4
Grading of Aortic Valve Calcification Severity and Risk Stratification in Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣钙化严重程度分级及主动脉瓣狭窄危险分层。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 6;13(15):e035605. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.035605. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
5
Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.计算机断层扫描主动脉瓣钙化评分在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146.
6
Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者的计算机断层扫描主动脉瓣钙化评分
Struct Heart. 2022 Apr 26;6(1):100027. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100027. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Aortic valve calcification among elderly males from the general population, associated echocardiographic findings, and clinical implications.普通人群中老年男性的主动脉瓣钙化、相关超声心动图表现及临床意义。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jan 24;23(2):177-184. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab182.
8
Optimal threshold score of aortic valve calcification for identification of significant aortic stenosis on non-electrocardiographic-gated computed tomography.非心电门控计算机断层扫描主动脉瓣钙化最佳截断值对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的评估。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Feb;33(2):1243-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09114-6. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
9
Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography.电子束计算机断层扫描测量主动脉瓣钙化的评估及临床意义
Circulation. 2004 Jul 20;110(3):356-62. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000135469.82545.D0. Epub 2004 Jul 12.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of virtual non-contrast CT for aortic valve stenosis severity evaluation.虚拟非对比 CT 评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的诊断准确性。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 Jan-Feb;18(1):50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2023.10.007. Epub 2023 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic and therapeutic implications of a low aortic valve calcium score in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis.低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣钙评分低的预后及治疗意义
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jan 31;26(2):287-298. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae276.
2
Aortic Valve Calcium Score: Applications in Clinical Practice and Scientific Research-A Narrative Review.主动脉瓣钙化评分:在临床实践与科研中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 11;13(14):4064. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144064.
3
Potential Clinical Usefulness of Post-Valvular Contrast Densities to Determine the Severity of Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Computed Tomography.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of aortic valve calcium quantification thresholds measured by computed tomography in Asian patients with calcific aortic stenosis.经计算机断层扫描测量的主动脉瓣钙化定量阈值在亚洲钙化性主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的验证。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Apr 18;23(5):717-726. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab116.
2
The Impact of Aortic Valvular Calcium on Transcatheter Heart Valve Distortion.主动脉瓣钙质对经导管心脏瓣膜变形的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Jan 5;2021:8829906. doi: 10.1155/2021/8829906. eCollection 2021.
3
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
利用计算机断层扫描通过瓣后对比密度来确定主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的潜在临床应用价值
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Sep 30;10(10):412. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10100412.
4
Calcium Scoring to Classify Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity: What Is the Current Data?主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的钙评分分类:目前有哪些数据?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Sep;25(9):1095-1101. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01929-z. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
JCS/JSCS/JATS/JSVS 2020 Guidelines on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease.JCS/JSCS/JATS/JSVS 2020年心脏瓣膜病管理指南
Circ J. 2020 Oct 23;84(11):2037-2119. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0135. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Sex differences in aortic valve calcification in severe aortic valve stenosis: association between computer tomography assessed calcification and valvular calcium concentrations.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣钙化的性别差异:计算机断层扫描评估钙化与瓣上钙浓度的相关性。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Apr 28;22(5):581-588. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa096.
6
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
7
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
8
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in Japan: Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN) Japanese multicenter registry.日本经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果:优化导管瓣膜干预(OCEAN)日本多中心注册研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Oct;20(10):843-851. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.计算机断层扫描主动脉瓣钙化评分在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146.
10
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2017年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.