• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非心电门控计算机断层扫描主动脉瓣钙化最佳截断值对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的评估。

Optimal threshold score of aortic valve calcification for identification of significant aortic stenosis on non-electrocardiographic-gated computed tomography.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2023 Feb;33(2):1243-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09114-6. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-022-09114-6
PMID:36066729
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the association between aortic valve calcification (AVC) and aortic stenosis (AS) by scoring the AVC to determine the threshold scores for significant AS on non-electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the AVC scores of 5385 patients on non-contrast non-ECG-gated CT, who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) from March 1, 2013, to December 26, 2019, at our institution. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify potential risk factors for significant AS. The thresholds for significant AS were computed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, based on the AVC scores after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A significant association was found between AS and age (p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.06), female sex (p < 0.001; OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.75-7.36), bicuspid aortic valve (p < 0.001; OR, 23.2; 95% CI, 7.35-72.9), and AVC score (AVC score/100) (p < 0.001; OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.71-1.95). All sex-specific AVC thresholds for significant AS (moderate and over AS severity, moderate and over AS severity without discordance, discordant severe AS, and concordant severe AS) showed high sensitivity and specificity (AUC, 0.939-0.968; sensitivity, 84.6-96%; specificity, 84.2-97.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

We determined the optimal AVC threshold scores for significant AS, which may aid in diagnosing significant asymptomatic AS on incidental detection of AVC through non-ECG-gated CT for non-cardiac indications.

KEY POINTS

• Increased frequency of non-electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) for non-cardiac indications has led to the increased incidental identification of aortic valve calcification (AVC). • It is important to identify patients with significant aortic stenosis (AS) who require additional echocardiographic assessment on incidental detection of AVC via non-ECG-gated CT. • We determined the AVC thresholds with high sensitivity and specificity to identify significant AS on non-ECG-gated CT, which could lead to early diagnosis of asymptomatic significant AS and improved prognosis.

摘要

目的

本研究通过对主动脉瓣钙化(AVC)评分来评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)与 AVC 的相关性,以确定非心电图门控(ECG)计算机断层扫描(CT)诊断重度 AS 的临界评分。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2013 年 3 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 26 日期间在我院行非对比非 ECG 门控 CT 的 5385 例患者的 AVC 评分。使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定重度 AS 的潜在危险因素。根据 AVC 评分和倾向评分匹配后的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线计算重度 AS 的临界值。

结果

AS 与年龄呈显著相关(p<0.001;优势比[OR],1.04;95%置信区间[CI],1.02-1.06)、女性(p<0.001;OR,4.5;95%CI,2.75-7.36)、二叶式主动脉瓣(p<0.001;OR,23.2;95%CI,7.35-72.9)和 AVC 评分(AVC 评分/100)(p<0.001;OR,1.82;95%CI,1.71-1.95)。所有性别特异性重度 AS 的 AVC 临界值(中度和重度以上 AS、中度和重度以上 AS 无差异、差异重度 AS 和一致重度 AS)均显示出较高的灵敏度和特异性(AUC,0.939-0.968;灵敏度,84.6-96%;特异性,84.2-97.1%)。

结论

我们确定了重度 AS 的最佳 AVC 临界评分,这可能有助于通过非心电图门控 CT 诊断非心脏指征时意外发现的无症状重度 AS。

重点

• 非心电图门控(ECG)计算机断层扫描(CT)用于非心脏指征的频率增加导致意外发现主动脉瓣钙化(AVC)的频率增加。• 重要的是要识别出在非心电图门控 CT 意外发现 AVC 时,需要进一步进行超声心动图评估的重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者。• 我们确定了具有高灵敏度和特异性的 AVC 临界值,以在非心电图门控 CT 上识别重度 AS,这可能导致无症状重度 AS 的早期诊断和改善预后。

相似文献

1
Optimal threshold score of aortic valve calcification for identification of significant aortic stenosis on non-electrocardiographic-gated computed tomography.非心电门控计算机断层扫描主动脉瓣钙化最佳截断值对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的评估。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Feb;33(2):1243-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09114-6. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Accuracy of aortic valve calcification volume score for identification of significant aortic stenosis on non-electrocardiographic-gated computed tomography compared to the Agatston scoring system.非心电门控计算机断层扫描主动脉瓣钙化容积评分对主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的评估与 Agatston 评分系统的比较。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 Jul-Aug;18(4):352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
3
Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.计算机断层扫描主动脉瓣钙化评分在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146.
4
Visual scoring of aortic valve calcifications on low-dose CT in lung cancer screening.低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查中主动脉瓣钙化的可视评分。
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2658-2668. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06614-w. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
Association between aortic valve calcification measured on non-contrast computed tomography and aortic valve stenosis in the general population.普通人群中,非增强计算机断层扫描测量的主动脉瓣钙化与主动脉瓣狭窄之间的关联。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug;10(4):309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 21.
6
Aortic Valve Calcification Density Measured by MDCT in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Severity.MDCT 测量主动脉瓣钙化密度评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 May;17(5):e016267. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.016267. Epub 2024 May 21.
7
The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.不和谐严重钙化主动脉瓣疾病分级的复杂性:联合多普勒超声心动图和计算机断层扫描研究的新见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
8
Grading of Aortic Valve Calcification Severity and Risk Stratification in Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣钙化严重程度分级及主动脉瓣狭窄危险分层。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 6;13(15):e035605. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.035605. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
9
Diagnostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification Levels in the Assessment of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣钙化程度对低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄评估的诊断价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug;17(8):847-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 May 22.
10
Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study.通过多层螺旋CT测量的主动脉瓣钙化对主动脉瓣狭窄患者生存的影响:一项国际注册研究的结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 23;64(12):1202-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.066.

引用本文的文献

1
Aortic Valve Calcium Score: Applications in Clinical Practice and Scientific Research-A Narrative Review.主动脉瓣钙化评分:在临床实践与科研中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 11;13(14):4064. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144064.
2
Potential Clinical Usefulness of Post-Valvular Contrast Densities to Determine the Severity of Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Computed Tomography.利用计算机断层扫描通过瓣后对比密度来确定主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的潜在临床应用价值
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Sep 30;10(10):412. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10100412.