Suppr超能文献

经食管超声心动图检查时偶然发现的非感染性心脏植入式电子设备导线肿物的患病率及相关因素:一项回顾性队列研究

Prevalence and Predisposing Factors of Non-infectious Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Lead Masses as Incidental Finding During Transoesophageal Echocardiography: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Kuecken Tanja, Jasaityte Ruta, Bülow Cara, Gross Jessica, Haase-Fielitz Anja, Neuss Michael, Butter Christian

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre Brandenburg Bernau, Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) Theodor Fontane, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Bernau, Germany.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 14;9:879505. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.879505. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we assessed the prevalence and predisposing factors of non-infectious CIED lead masses as incidental finding during transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE).

METHODS

In a retrospective single centre study, we analysed TOE examinations performed for indications other than infectious endocarditis in 141 patients with CIED. Patients with non-suspicious leads and those with incidental non-infectious lead masses were compared with respect to clinical characteristics, anticoagulation, indication for TOE, and CIED lead characteristics. The odds ratios for non-infectious CIED lead masses were calculated.

RESULTS

Non-infectious CIED lead masses were detected in 39 (27.6%) of the 141 patients. They were more often identified on ICD and CRT-D leads compared to pacemaker and CRT-P leads [OR 2.77 (95% CI 1.29-5.95), = 0.008]. The lifespan of the CIEDs from the first implantation to the index TOE did not differ between both groups. Incidental CIED lead masses were more prevalent in patients who received their device for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (43.2%) and for resynchronisation (63.6%) but were less prevalent in patients with oral anticoagulation [OR.33 (95% CI.003-1.003), = 0.048].

CONCLUSION

Incidental non-infectious CIED lead masses were frequently found in TOE, with highest prevalence in ICD and CRT-D devices implanted for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Patients with therapeutic anticoagulation had significantly lower prevalence of CIED lead masses than those without.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们评估了经食管超声心动图(TOE)检查时作为偶然发现的非感染性心脏植入电子设备(CIED)导线赘生物的患病率及相关易感因素。

方法

在一项回顾性单中心研究中,我们分析了141例CIED患者因感染性心内膜炎以外的适应证而进行的TOE检查。将导线无异常的患者与偶然发现非感染性导线赘生物的患者在临床特征、抗凝情况、TOE适应证及CIED导线特征方面进行比较。计算非感染性CIED导线赘生物的比值比。

结果

141例患者中有39例(27.6%)检测到非感染性CIED导线赘生物。与起搏器和心脏再同步化治疗-起搏器(CRT-P)导线相比,植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步化治疗-除颤器(CRT-D)导线上更常发现此类赘生物[比值比2.77(95%可信区间1.29 - 5.95),P = 0.008]。两组患者从首次植入CIED到索引TOE的使用寿命无差异。偶然发现的CIED导线赘生物在接受设备用于心脏性猝死一级预防的患者中更为常见(43.2%),在接受心脏再同步化治疗的患者中也较为常见(63.6%),但在接受口服抗凝治疗的患者中较少见[比值比0.33(95%可信区间0.003 - 1.003),P = 0.048]。

结论

TOE检查时经常发现偶然的非感染性CIED导线赘生物,在为扩张型心肌病患者植入的ICD和CRT-D设备中患病率最高。接受治疗性抗凝的患者CIED导线赘生物的患病率显著低于未接受抗凝治疗的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84e0/9237605/9336792aacad/fcvm-09-879505-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验