• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2012年至2019年美国全膝关节置换翻修术的流行病学

Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States, 2012 to 2019.

作者信息

Upfill-Brown Alexander, Hsiue Peter P, Sekimura Troy, Shi Brendan, Ahlquist Seth A, Patel Jay N, Adamson Micah, Stavrakis Alexandra I

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 21;15:188-195.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.004. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.004
PMID:35774881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9237286/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As primary total knee arthroplasty volume continues to increase, so will the number of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) procedures. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated perspective on the incidence, indications, and financial burden of rTKA in the United States.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective epidemiologic analysis using the National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases ninth and tenth revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent rTKA and create cohorts based on rTKA indications from 2012 to 2019. National and regional trends for length of stay, cost, and discharge location were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 505,160 rTKA procedures were identified. The annual number of rTKA procedures increased by 29.6% over the study period (56,490 to 73,205). The top 3 indications for rTKA were aseptic loosening (23.1%), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (20.4%), and instability (11.0%). Over the study period, the proportion of patients discharged to skilled nursing facility decreased from 31.7% to 24.1% ( < .001). Hospital length of stay decreased from 4.0 days in 2012 to 3.8 days in 2019 ( < .001). Hospital costs increased by $1300 from $25,730 to $27,077 ( < .001). The proportion of rTKA cases performed at urban academic centers increased (52.1% to 74.3%, < .001) while that at urban nonacademic centers decreased (39.0% to 19.2%, < .001).

CONCLUSION

The top 3 indications for rTKA were aseptic loosening, PJI, and instability, with PJI becoming the most common indication in 2019. These cases are increasingly being performed at urban academic centers and away from urban nonacademic centers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 (Retrospective cohort study).

摘要

背景

随着初次全膝关节置换手术量持续增加,翻修全膝关节置换术(rTKA)的数量也会随之增加。本研究的目的是提供关于美国rTKA的发病率、适应证及经济负担的最新观点。

材料与方法

这是一项使用国家住院患者样本的回顾性流行病学分析。采用国际疾病分类第九版和第十版编码来识别接受rTKA的患者,并根据2012年至2019年的rTKA适应证创建队列。评估住院时间、费用及出院地点的全国和地区趋势。

结果

共识别出505,160例rTKA手术。在研究期间,rTKA手术的年数量增加了29.6%(从56,490例增至73,205例)。rTKA的前三大适应证为无菌性松动(23.1%)、假体周围关节感染(PJI)(20.4%)和不稳定(11.0%)。在研究期间,出院至专业护理机构的患者比例从31.7%降至24.1%(P<0.001)。住院时间从2012年的4.0天降至2019年的3.8天(P<0.001)。医院费用从25,730美元增加了1300美元至27,077美元(P<0.001)。在城市学术中心进行的rTKA病例比例增加(从52.1%增至74.3%,P<0.001),而在城市非学术中心进行的比例下降(从39.0%降至19.2%,P<0.001)。

结论

rTKA的前三大适应证为无菌性松动、PJI和不稳定,其中PJI在2019年成为最常见的适应证。这些病例越来越多地在城市学术中心进行,而不在城市非学术中心进行。

证据水平

3级(回顾性队列研究)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eec/9237286/4459510e6be1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eec/9237286/e65e8a453453/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eec/9237286/1268b1ed949f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eec/9237286/4459510e6be1/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eec/9237286/e65e8a453453/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eec/9237286/1268b1ed949f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eec/9237286/4459510e6be1/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States, 2012 to 2019.2012年至2019年美国全膝关节置换翻修术的流行病学
Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 21;15:188-195.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.004. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Instability Is the Most Common Indication for Revision Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Trends From 2012 to 2018.在美国,不稳定是髋关节置换翻修术最常见的指征:2012年至2018年的全国趋势。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Aug 31;11:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.001. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Quantifying the Burden of Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Infection.量化假体周围感染翻修全关节置换术的负担
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9):1492-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.035. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
4
Analyzing the Burden of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States between 2009 and 2016.分析2009年至2016年美国翻修全膝关节置换术的负担。
J Knee Surg. 2023 Jan;36(2):121-131. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731324. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
5
Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.美国 2030 年翻修髋和膝关节置换术的预测和流行病学。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S79-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis.单家高手术量机构全膝关节置换术翻修病因的时间趋势:一项流行病学分析
Arthroplast Today. 2021 May 17;9:68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.04.001. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Impact of time to revision total knee arthroplasty on outcomes following aseptic failure.翻修全膝关节置换术的时间对无菌性失败后结局的影响。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2023 May 30;35(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s43019-023-00191-5.
8
Outcomes following robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术的结果比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2223-2227. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05231-7. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
9
Are there avoidable causes of early revision total knee arthroplasty?早期翻修全膝关节置换术是否存在可避免的原因?
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Jun 18;34(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00157-z.
10
Does stem profile have an impact on the failure patterns in revision total knee arthroplasty?胫骨假体轮廓对翻修全膝关节置换术后假体失败模式是否有影响?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1549-1569. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04683-z. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
[Revision analysis and successful solutions for my failed primary total knee arthroplasties].[我失败的初次全膝关节置换术的翻修分析及成功解决方案]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04714-8.
2
Knee Arthroplasty Types: An Educational Framework for Multidisciplinary Healthcare Teams.膝关节置换类型:多学科医疗团队的教育框架
Cureus. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):e89127. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89127. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Patients with History of Metastasis Have Differing Surgical Indications and Increased Perioperative Risk Following Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.

本文引用的文献

1
Instability Is the Most Common Indication for Revision Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Trends From 2012 to 2018.在美国,不稳定是髋关节置换翻修术最常见的指征:2012年至2018年的全国趋势。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Aug 31;11:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.001. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Migration Patterns for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States as Reported in the American Joint Replacement Registry.美国关节置换登记处报告的美国翻修全膝关节置换术的迁移模式。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Oct;36(10):3538-3542. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3
Highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of revision for aseptic loosening: a meta-analysis of 962,467 cases.
有转移病史的患者在翻修全关节置换术后有不同的手术指征且围手术期风险增加。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Aug 6;16:21514593251366161. doi: 10.1177/21514593251366161. eCollection 2025.
4
Effect of Converting Kinematic Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty to Mechanical Axis Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty on Gap Measurements.将运动学对线全膝关节置换转换为机械轴翻修全膝关节置换对间隙测量的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 12;17(4):e82148. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82148. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
AI classification of knee prostheses from plain radiographs and real-world applications.基于X线平片的膝关节假体人工智能分类及实际应用
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 11;35(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04238-z.
6
Outpatient Revision TKA Does Not Increase Incidence of Repeat Revision or Medical and Surgical Complications Compared With Inpatient Revision TKA.与住院全膝关节置换翻修术相比,门诊全膝关节置换翻修术不会增加再次翻修的发生率或内科及外科并发症的发生率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 5;483(7):1302-7. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003386.
7
The Utility of Synovial Fluid Interleukin-10 in Diagnosing Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Cohort Study.滑液白细胞介素-10在诊断慢性人工关节感染中的应用:一项前瞻性队列研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Jan 28;18:533-542. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S490962. eCollection 2025.
8
The impact of pathogen sensitivity to antibiotics loaded in cement on the number of revisions and costs in the treatment of periprosthetic knee infection.病原体对骨水泥中所含抗生素的敏感性对人工膝关节周围感染治疗中翻修次数及费用的影响
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec 21;35(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04166-4.
9
Is Wear Still a Concern in Total Knee Arthroplasty With Contemporary Conventional and Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts in the mid- to Long-Term?对于使用当代传统及高度交联聚乙烯胫骨衬垫的全膝关节置换术,磨损在中长期仍然是一个需要关注的问题吗?
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 30;30:101550. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101550. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Assessment of the Potential Role of Preoperative Dental Clearance in Total Joint Arthroplasty Optimization: A Pilot Study.术前口腔检查在全关节置换术优化中的潜在作用评估:一项初步研究。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e68022. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68022. eCollection 2024 Aug.
在初次全膝关节置换术中使用超高交联聚乙烯与较低的无菌性松动翻修率相关:一项 962467 例病例的荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun;142(6):1177-1184. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03887-z. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
More Patients Are Being Discharged Home After Total Knee Arthroplasty, However Rates Vary Between Large Databases.越来越多的全膝关节置换术后患者出院回家,但在大型数据库之间,其出院率存在差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):173-179. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.059. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
5
The Inaccuracy of ICD-10 Coding in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty and Its Implication on Revision Data.翻修全髋关节置换术中ICD - 10编码的不准确及其对翻修数据的影响
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Oct;35(10):2960-2965.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
Aseptic Loosening at the Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Function of Cement Mantle Quality?全膝关节置换术后胫骨无菌性松动:与骨水泥套质量有关?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S190-S196. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.美国 2030 年翻修髋和膝关节置换术的预测和流行病学。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S79-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
Conventional Versus Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Primary Total Knee Replacement: A Comparison of Revision Rates Using Data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.常规交联聚乙烯与高交联聚乙烯在初次全膝关节置换中的应用:来自英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰国家联合登记处数据的翻修率比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jan 15;102(2):119-127. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00031.
9
Trends in Length of Stay and 30-Day Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis From 2006 to 2016.2006 年至 2016 年全膝关节置换术后住院时间和 30 天并发症趋势分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1575-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Discharge to the skilled nursing facility: patient risk factors and perioperative outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.转至专业护理机构:全膝关节置换术后患者的危险因素及围手术期结局
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Feb;7(4):65. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.12.62.