Suppr超能文献

在初次全膝关节置换术中使用超高交联聚乙烯与较低的无菌性松动翻修率相关:一项 962467 例病例的荟萃分析。

Highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of revision for aseptic loosening: a meta-analysis of 962,467 cases.

机构信息

Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10022, USA.

School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun;142(6):1177-1184. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03887-z. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evolution in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) includes the highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) which has been reported as an effective manner to reduce the wear of the polyethylene and the osteolysis. The purpose of the present study is to synthesize the results of comparative studies between HXLPE and conventional polyethylenes and determine their effect in primary TKA.

METHODS

The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications utilizing the following keywords: "cross-linked", "polyethylene", "HXLPE", "conventional", "total knee arthroplasty", "TKA", "total knee replacement" and "TKR" combined with Boolean operators AND and OR.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the present meta-analysis with 962,467 patients. No significant difference was found regarding the revision rate for any reason between the patients who received HXLPE and those with conventional liner (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.39-1.18; I: 97.7%). In addition, there was no difference regarding the radiolucent lines between the two types of liners (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.20-1.49; I: 69.4%). However, with data coming from seven studies enrolling a total of 411,543 patients, it was demonstrated that patients who received HXLPE were less likely to be revised due to aseptic loosening compared to the patients with conventional liners (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.31-0.39; I: 0.0%).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis showed that regarding the overall revision rate and radiographic outcomes there was no significant difference between the two types of liners. On the other hand, the significantly less revision rate due to loosening supports the routine continued use of HXLPE in primary TKA.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术(TKA)的发展包括高交联聚乙烯(HXLPE),它已被报道为一种有效减少聚乙烯磨损和骨溶解的方法。本研究的目的是综合比较 HXLPE 和传统聚乙烯的研究结果,并确定它们在初次 TKA 中的作用。

方法

美国国家医学图书馆(PubMed/MEDLINE)和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库被用来检索使用以下关键词的出版物:“交联”、“聚乙烯”、“HXLPE”、“传统”、“全膝关节置换术”、“TKA”、“全膝关节置换”和“TKR”,并结合布尔运算符 AND 和 OR。

结果

有 10 项研究符合纳入标准,并被纳入本 meta 分析,共纳入 962467 例患者。接受 HXLPE 和传统衬垫的患者在任何原因的翻修率方面没有显著差异(OR 0.67;95%CI 0.39-1.18;I:97.7%)。此外,两种衬垫之间的放射性透明线没有差异(OR 0.54;95%CI 0.20-1.49;I:69.4%)。然而,来自 7 项研究的共 411543 例患者的数据表明,接受 HXLPE 的患者因无菌性松动而需要翻修的可能性低于接受传统衬垫的患者(OR 0.35;95%CI 0.31-0.39;I:0.0%)。

结论

本 meta 分析显示,在总体翻修率和影像学结果方面,两种衬垫之间没有显著差异。另一方面,由于松动导致的翻修率显著降低,支持在初次 TKA 中常规继续使用 HXLPE。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验