Department of Urology, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario.
Inflammation Research Network-Snyder Institute for Chronic Disease, Departments of Physiology and Pharmacology and Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta.
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Jun 30;94(2):248-251. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.2.248.
To assess the association between Cannabis use and bladder cancer.
A systematic literature review was performed using studies published in electronic databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar. Due to the scarcity of literature on this topic, the search was not limited to a specific design, year of publication, or human studies. The studies were screened by two reviewers in the following steps; first, the studies were discovered according to the predetermined search strategy; second, the unrelated studies and duplicates were eliminated by screening the abstracts, titles, and keywords; third, the full text of relevant and eligible papers were critically appraised and assessed for the risk of bias using the respective tool. The two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and outcome levels using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the outcomes in observational studies. Any disagreements were settled by a third party.
The search strategy yielded 39 research articles. After removing 21 duplicates, 18 publications were eligible for title and abstract review. Thirteen studies were found to be irrelevant and subsequently excluded. Only three full-text articles were evaluated and included in the qualitative synthesis.
The role of Cannabis in bladder cancer has been seldom studied. The small number of studies show contradictory findings; potential carcinogenic versus protective effect. The growing interest in Cannabis use after legalization necessitates further investigations with a robust design to assess the long-term effect of Cannabis on bladder cancer.
评估大麻使用与膀胱癌之间的关联。
使用包括 PubMed、MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar 在内的电子数据库进行系统文献回顾。由于该主题的文献稀缺,因此搜索并未限于特定的设计、发布年份或人类研究。通过以下步骤由两名评审员筛选研究:首先,根据预定的搜索策略发现研究;其次,通过筛选摘要、标题和关键词来排除不相关的研究和重复研究;第三,批判性地评估相关和合格论文的全文,并使用相应的工具评估偏倚风险。两位综述作者使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale)独立评估观察性研究结果的偏倚风险和结果水平。任何分歧均由第三方解决。
搜索策略产生了 39 篇研究文章。去除 21 篇重复文章后,有 18 篇出版物符合标题和摘要审查标准。发现 13 项研究不相关,随后被排除。仅评估并纳入了 3 篇全文文章进行定性综合分析。
大麻在膀胱癌中的作用很少被研究。少数研究结果存在矛盾;潜在的致癌作用与保护作用。合法化后大麻使用的兴趣日益增加,需要进一步进行设计合理的研究,以评估大麻对膀胱癌的长期影响。