• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《通用手套和手术衣使用对艰难梭菌获得的影响:一项集群随机试验》。

The Impact of Universal Glove and Gown Use on Clostridioides Difficile Acquisition: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine and VA Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):e1202-e1207. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac519.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciac519
PMID:35776131
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile is the most common cause of healthcare-associated infections in the United States. It is unknown whether universal gown and glove use in intensive care units (ICUs) decreases acquisition of C. difficile.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized trial in 20 medical and surgical ICUs in 20 US hospitals from 4 January 2012 to 4 October 2012. After a baseline period, ICUs were randomized to standard practice for glove and gown use versus the intervention of all healthcare workers being required to wear gloves and gowns for all patient contact and when entering any patient room (contact precautions). The primary outcome was acquisition of toxigenic C. difficile determined by surveillance cultures collected on admission and discharge from the ICU.

RESULTS

A total of 21 845 patients had both admission and discharge perianal swabs cultured for toxigenic C. difficile. On admission, 9.43% (2060/21 845) of patients were colonized with toxigenic C. difficile. No significant difference was observed in the rate of toxigenic C. difficile acquisition with universal gown and glove use. Differences in acquisition rates in the study period compared with the baseline period in control ICUs were 1.49 per 100 patient-days versus 1.68 per 100 patient-days in universal gown and glove ICUs (rate difference, -0.28; generalized linear mixed model, P = .091).

CONCLUSIONS

Glove and gown use for all patient contact in medical and surgical ICUs did not result in a reduction in the acquisition of C. difficile compared with usual care.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01318213.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌是美国最常见的医疗保健相关感染病原体。目前尚不清楚重症监护病房(ICU)内普遍使用长袍和手套是否会减少艰难梭菌的感染。

方法

这是一项在美国 20 家医院的 20 个内科和外科 ICU 中进行的集群随机试验的二次分析。在基线期之后,将 ICU 随机分为标准手套和长袍使用组与干预组,干预组要求所有医护人员在接触患者和进入任何患者病房时(接触预防措施)均需戴手套和长袍。主要结局是通过在 ICU 入院和出院时采集的监测培养物确定的产毒艰难梭菌感染。

结果

共有 21845 名患者入院和出院时进行了肛拭子艰难梭菌产毒培养。入院时,21845 名患者中有 9.43%(2060/21845)定植有产毒艰难梭菌。普遍使用长袍和手套并未显著降低产毒艰难梭菌的感染率。与对照组 ICU 相比,研究期间的感染率差异在控制 ICU 中分别为每 100 患者日 1.49 例与每 100 患者日 1.68 例(差异率,-0.28;广义线性混合模型,P =.091)。

结论

与常规护理相比,在普通内科和外科 ICU 中对所有患者接触均使用长袍和手套并不能减少艰难梭菌的感染。

临床试验注册

NCT01318213。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Universal Glove and Gown Use on Clostridioides Difficile Acquisition: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.《通用手套和手术衣使用对艰难梭菌获得的影响:一项集群随机试验》。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):e1202-e1207. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac519.
2
Universal glove and gown use and acquisition of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the ICU: a randomized trial.通用手套和手术衣的使用与 ICU 中抗生素耐药菌的获得:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2013 Oct 16;310(15):1571-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.277815.
3
The Effect of Universal Glove and Gown Use on Adverse Events in Intensive Care Unit Patients.《通用手套和手术衣使用对重症监护病房患者不良事件的影响》
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 15;61(4):545-53. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ315. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
4
Acquisition of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria in the Benefits of Universal Glove and Gown (BUGG) Cluster Randomized Trial.在通用手套和手术衣(BUGG)集群随机试验中获得耐抗生素革兰氏阴性菌。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 1;72(3):431-437. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa071.
5
A comparison of the effect of universal use of gloves and gowns with that of glove use alone on acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a medical intensive care unit.在一个医疗重症监护病房中,比较普遍使用手套和隔离衣与仅使用手套对耐万古霉素肠球菌感染的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Sep 15;125(6):448-56. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-6-199609150-00004.
6
Deconstructing the relative benefits of a universal glove and gown intervention on MRSA acquisition.剖析通用手套和隔离衣干预措施对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染获得的相对益处。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 May;96(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
Compliance with routine use of gowns by healthcare workers (HCWs) and non-HCW visitors on entry into the rooms of patients under contact precautions.医护人员(HCWs)和非医护人员访客进入采取接触预防措施的患者房间时,遵守常规穿隔离衣的规定。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):337-40. doi: 10.1086/510811. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
8
Intervention to reduce transmission of resistant bacteria in intensive care.重症监护中减少耐药菌传播的干预措施。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 14;364(15):1407-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000373.
9
The role of gown and glove isolation and strict handwashing in the reduction of nosocomial infection in children with solid organ transplantation.隔离衣和手套隔离以及严格洗手在降低实体器官移植儿童医院感染中的作用。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):405-12. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00034.
10
Isolation of PCR Ribotype 027 from single-use hospital gown ties.从一次性使用的医院长袍系带中分离出 PCR 核糖型 027。
J Med Microbiol. 2022 Jun;71(6). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001550.

引用本文的文献

1
Three stages of laboratory stewardship in improving appropriate testing in a community-based setting.在社区环境中改善合理检测的实验室管理的三个阶段。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 19;5(1):e81. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.55. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of universal contact precautions and chlorhexidine bathing on the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales in the intensive care unit: a cohort study.接触预防和氯己定沐浴对重症监护病房获得碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科的影响:一项队列研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Nov 22;13(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01495-1.
3
Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: The Silent Plight of Burn Patients.
多重耐药菌:烧伤患者的无声苦难。
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Aug 6;45(4):877-886. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae075.
4
Genomic surveillance of transmission and virulence in a healthcare setting.医疗机构中传播与毒力的基因组监测。
mBio. 2024 Mar 13;15(3):e0330023. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03300-23. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
5
Strategies to prevent infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.急性护理医院预防感染的策略:2022年更新版
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;44(4):527-549. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.18.
6
Contact precautions for the control of endemic pathogens: Finding the middle path.通过接触预防措施控制地方性病原体:探寻中间道路。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Mar 24;3(1):e57. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.145. eCollection 2023.