Suppr超能文献

镜面光泽度测量能否预测牙科聚合物抛光/上光方案的有效性?系统评价和线性混合效应预测模型。

Can Specular Gloss Measurements Predict the Effectiveness of Finishing/Polishing Protocols in Dental Polymers? A Systematic Review and Linear Mixed-effects Prediction Model.

机构信息

*Teresa Pinheiro de Melo, DDS, Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Monte de Caparica, Portugal.

António HS Delgado, DDS, Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Monte de Caparica, Portugal; 2 Department of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2022 May 1;47(3):E131-E151. doi: 10.2341/21-027-LIT.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The current gold standard measure to assess polishing efficacy is surface roughness (SR) assessed in laboratory research. Specular gloss (SG) has been negatively correlated to SR, which raises the following question: Can SG be used to accurately determine the effectiveness of a finishing/polishing procedure in direct resin composites?

METHODS

A systematic approach and search strategy, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, was developed and conducted in five electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE (Ovid), and SciELO/LILACS to identify laboratory studies that assessed SR and SG, simultaneously, of resin composites, without date or language restriction. Risk of bias assessment was carried out by two reviewers, independently. From the extracted quantitative data of SG/SR, regression analyses were performed, and a linear mixed-effects prediction model was derived using the nimble package in R (v4.0.3).

RESULTS

A total of 928 potential studies were found, out of which, 13 were eligible after criterion screening. Experimental groups featured 31 resin composites of six different filler types, with the most common being microhybrids followed by nanohybrids. More than half of the studies initially reported a linear correlation between SR and SG, which ranged from r2 = 0.34-0.96. Taking into account the regression analysis and prediction model posteriorly performed, the corresponding SG threshold for 0.2 μm is estimated to be >55 GU. Most of the evidence was classified as moderate or high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

SG is universally correlated to SR in polymers, and a reference value of >55 GU is proposed, above which samples are considered well polished.

摘要

目的

评估抛光效果的当前金标准测量方法是在实验室研究中评估表面粗糙度(SR)。镜面光泽度(SG)与 SR 呈负相关,这就提出了以下问题:SG 是否可用于准确确定直接复合树脂中抛光/抛光程序的有效性?

方法

按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,制定并进行了系统的方法和搜索策略,在五个电子数据库中进行了搜索:PubMed/Medline、Scopus、Web of Science、EMBASE(Ovid)和 SciELO/LILACS,以确定同时评估树脂复合材料的 SR 和 SG 的实验室研究,无日期或语言限制。由两名评审员独立进行偏倚风险评估。从提取的 SG/SR 定量数据中进行回归分析,并使用 R(v4.0.3)中的 nimble 包得出线性混合效应预测模型。

结果

共发现 928 项潜在研究,其中 13 项经过标准筛选后符合条件。实验组有 31 种不同填充类型的树脂复合材料,最常见的是微混合体,其次是纳米混合体。超过一半的研究最初报告 SR 和 SG 之间存在线性相关性,范围从 r2 = 0.34-0.96。考虑到随后进行的回归分析和预测模型,估计 0.2μm 的相应 SG 阈值为>55GU。大部分证据被归类为中度或高度偏倚风险。

结论

SG 在聚合物中普遍与 SR 相关,提出了>55GU 的参考值,超过该值的样本被认为抛光良好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验