Isaacs Anton N, Brooks Helen, Lawn Sharon, Mohammadi Leila, Vicary Emily, Sutton Keith
Monash University, School of Rural Health, 15 Sargeant St., Warragul, Victoria, Australia.
Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Schizophr Res. 2022 Aug;246:132-147. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.06.018. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
This review aimed to examine the evidence base for the use of personal recovery facilitators [non-psychopharmacological approaches] for adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and other psychoses. A systematic review (umbrella review) was conducted of reviews published in English between January 2010 and February 2022, which examined the effectiveness of personal recovery facilitators to support aspects of personal recovery as defined by the CHIME framework (connectedness, hope and optimism, identity, meaning and purpose, and empowerment). Twenty-one systematic reviews on thirteen different types of personal recovery facilitators [PRFs] were included in this umbrella review. Only one review sought to directly measure personal recovery processes according to the CHIME framework. Outcome measures mostly aligned with the processes of hope (21 reviews) and connectedness (19 reviews). Those related to empowerment (2 reviews), identity (5 reviews) and meaning and purpose (1 review) were less frequently the focus of PRFs. Yoga and music therapy showed the most promise as PRFs. Vocational treatments and integrated supported employment show good potential as personal recovery facilitators. However, together with narrative photovoice, art making and exhibition, they require further robust research to fully examine their impact. Personal recovery is only beginning to be considered as an intended outcome of interventions for persons with schizophrenia and other psychoses. This may be due in part to the continued predominance of the biomedical model approach to recovery within statutory services. Future evaluations of PRFs should include outcome measures that directly assess personal recovery according to the CHIME framework or other measures developed in consultation with recipients of these approaches. Review registration number and date: PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020215471: 10/11/20.
本综述旨在研究针对诊断为精神分裂症和其他精神病的成年人使用个人康复促进者[非药物治疗方法]的证据基础。对2010年1月至2022年2月期间以英文发表的综述进行了系统综述(综合综述),这些综述考察了个人康复促进者在支持由CHIME框架(联系、希望与乐观、身份认同、意义与目的、赋权)所定义的个人康复方面的有效性。本综合综述纳入了21篇关于13种不同类型个人康复促进者[PRF]的系统综述。只有一篇综述试图根据CHIME框架直接衡量个人康复过程。结果测量大多与希望(21篇综述)和联系(19篇综述)的过程一致。与赋权(2篇综述)、身份认同(5篇综述)以及意义与目的(1篇综述)相关的内容较少成为个人康复促进者的关注焦点。瑜伽和音乐疗法作为个人康复促进者显示出最大的前景。职业治疗和综合支持就业作为个人康复促进者显示出良好的潜力。然而,连同叙事摄影声音、艺术创作与展览一起,它们需要进一步有力的研究以全面考察其影响。个人康复才刚刚开始被视为针对精神分裂症和其他精神病患者干预措施的预期结果。这可能部分归因于法定服务中生物医学模式康复方法的持续主导地位。未来对个人康复促进者的评估应包括根据CHIME框架直接评估个人康复的结果测量或与这些方法的接受者协商制定的其他测量方法。综述注册号和日期:PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020215471:2020年11月10日。