• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术切除高危角化细胞癌中完整边缘评估与节段性评估的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Complete Margin Assessment Versus Sectional Assessment in Surgically Excised High-Risk Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2022 Jul 1;48(7):704-710. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003462.

DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000003462
PMID:35778249
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Keratinocyte carcinomas (KCs) are the most diagnosed cancers worldwide and are commonly excised via complete margin assessment (CMA) or excision with sectional assessment (SA). National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines encourage CMA for KC with high-risk features.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically compare recurrence outcomes for CMA vs SA in high-risk KC based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched for articles reporting recurrences of high-risk KC undergoing excision using CMA or SA. High-risk KCs were defined as recurrent, having perineural invasion (PNI), or basal cell carcinomas (BCC) with aggressive histology. Chi-squared tests and risk ratios evaluated differences between CMA and SA groups, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Pooled percentages of locoregional recurrences were significantly lower with CMA vs SA for all KCs (3.9% [95% CI: 2.9-4.9] vs 13.5% [7.7, 19.2, p = .001]), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with PNI (9.8% [5.4-14.1] vs 32.0% [25.0-39.0], p < .001), and recurrent BCC (4.4% [2.9-5.9] vs 11.9% [8.0-15.8], p < .001).

CONCLUSION

For high-risk KCs, recurrence risk was over 3-times greater with SA compared with CMA. Expanded access to CMA for high-risk KC is likely to reduce recurrence risk and improve clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

角朊细胞癌(KC)是全球最常见的诊断癌症,通常通过完全边缘评估(CMA)或切除分段评估(SA)进行切除。国家综合癌症网络指南鼓励对具有高危特征的 KC 进行 CMA。

目的

根据国家综合癌症网络指南标准,系统比较高危 KC 中 CMA 与 SA 的复发结果。

材料和方法

在 EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 上搜索报道使用 CMA 或 SA 切除高危 KC 后复发的文章。高危 KC 定义为复发、有神经周围侵犯(PNI)或基底细胞癌(BCC)具有侵袭性组织学特征。卡方检验和风险比评估了 CMA 组和 SA 组之间的差异,并进行了随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

28 项研究符合纳入标准。所有 KC(3.9%[95%CI:2.9-4.9]与 13.5%[7.7,19.2,p=.001])、有 PNI 的皮肤鳞状细胞癌(9.8%[5.4-14.1]与 32.0%[25.0-39.0],p<.001)和复发性 BCC(4.4%[2.9-5.9]与 11.9%[8.0-15.8],p<.001)的局灶性复发百分比,CMA 显著低于 SA。

结论

对于高危 KC,SA 的复发风险比 CMA 高 3 倍以上。扩大高危 KC 的 CMA 应用范围可能会降低复发风险并改善临床结果。

相似文献

1
Complete Margin Assessment Versus Sectional Assessment in Surgically Excised High-Risk Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手术切除高危角化细胞癌中完整边缘评估与节段性评估的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dermatol Surg. 2022 Jul 1;48(7):704-710. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003462.
2
Melanomas of the head and neck have high-local recurrence risk features and require tissue-rearranging reconstruction more commonly than basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: A comparison of indications for microscopic margin control prior to reconstruction in 13,664 tumors.头颈部黑素瘤具有高局部复发风险特征,比基底细胞癌和鳞状细胞癌更需要组织重建:对 13664 个肿瘤重建前进行微观边缘控制适应证的比较。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Aug;85(2):409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.020. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
3
Timing of subsequent new tumors in patients who present with basal cell carcinoma or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.患有基底细胞癌或皮肤鳞状细胞癌患者的后续新发肿瘤时间。
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Apr;151(4):382-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3307.
4
Negative Predictive Value of Biopsy Margins in Keratinocyte Carcinoma: A Literature Review.活检切缘对角化细胞癌的阴性预测值:文献综述。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Apr;46(4):525-529. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002171.
5
Adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Criteria of Complete Circumferential Peripheral and Deep Margin Assessment in Treatment of High-Risk Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.遵循国家综合癌症网络标准,评估高危基底细胞和鳞状细胞癌的完全环周和深层切缘。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Dec;46(12):1473-1480. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002354.
6
Keratinocyte cancer with incidental perineural invasion: A registry analysis of management and 5-year outcomes.伴有偶然神经周围侵犯的角化细胞癌:管理和 5 年结果的登记分析。
Australas J Dermatol. 2020 Aug;61(3):226-230. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13290. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Risk of subsequent keratinocyte carcinomas after a first diagnosis in Tasmania, Australia.澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚首次诊断后的角质形成细胞癌风险。
Australas J Dermatol. 2023 Feb;64(1):108-117. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13938. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
8
Association Between Topical Calcineurin Inhibitor Use and Keratinocyte Carcinoma Risk Among Adults With Atopic Dermatitis.他克莫司和吡美莫司与特应性皮炎患者罹患角质形成细胞癌风险的相关性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Oct 1;156(10):1066-1073. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.2240.
9
Review of Perineural Invasion in Keratinocyte Carcinomas.角质形成细胞癌中神经周围浸润的综述
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Sep;22(5):653-666. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00615-6. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
10
Implication of wide surgical excision in minimizing positive margins and consequential secondary excision - a retrospective comparative study involving 106 basal cell carcinoma cases.广泛手术切除对减少阳性切缘和随后的二次切除的意义——一项涉及 106 例基底细胞癌病例的回顾性对比研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Jun;25(12):4283-4288. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202106_26134.

引用本文的文献

1
S2k guideline basal cell carcinoma of the skin (update 2023).S2k皮肤基底细胞癌指南(2023年更新)
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2024 Dec;22(12):1697-1714. doi: 10.1111/ddg.15566. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy Speeds up Surgical Margin Control of Re-Excised Skin Tumors and Greatly Shortens In-Hospital Stay.离体共聚焦显微镜可加快再次切除皮肤肿瘤的手术切缘控制,并大幅缩短住院时间。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;16(18):3209. doi: 10.3390/cancers16183209.
3
Management Approaches for High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Perineural Invasion: An Updated Review.
高风险伴有神经周围侵犯的皮肤鳞状细胞癌的治疗方法:最新综述。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024 Sep;25(9):1184-1192. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01234-z. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
Resection of Skin Cancer Resulting in Free Vascularized Tissue Reconstruction: Always a Therapeutic Failure?皮肤癌切除术后行带血管游离组织重建:总是治疗失败吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;15(9):2464. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092464.
5
Surgery in the Era of Immunotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Non-melanoma Skin Cancer.免疫治疗时代的晚期头颈部非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的手术治疗。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Jul;25(7):735-742. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01391-8. Epub 2023 Apr 3.