Kubota Shohei, Aoki Yuji, Sakai Tomomi, Kitamura Katsumasa, Matsui Teruaki, Takasato Yoshihiro, Sugiura Shiro, Nakamura Masashi, Matsunaga Kayoko, Ito Komei
Department of Allergy, Allergy and Immunology Center, Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center, Obu, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Department of Integrative Medical Science for Allergic Disease, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan; General Research and Development Institute, Hoyu Co., Ltd., Nagakute, Japan.
Allergol Int. 2022 Oct;71(4):505-511. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
Some patients with wheat allergy have been reported to show clinical cross-reactivity to barley. However, it is not clear whether the development of barley allergy in patients with wheat allergy is due to cross-antigenicity between wheat and barley. This study aimed to determine the clinical cross-reactivity and immunological cross-antigenicity of wheat and barley.
The results of barley oral food challenges (OFCs) were compared before and after oral immunotherapy (OIT) for wheat in nine patients with wheat allergy to estimate the clinical cross-reactivity of wheat and barley. Moreover, we performed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) inhibition and immunoblotting inhibition using serum from seven patients allergic to wheat and barley.
Nine patients who had positive barley-OFC results performed before OIT for wheat were all negative on barley-OFC performed after OIT. In ELISA inhibition, preincubation of serum from patients allergic to wheat and barley with a high barley extract concentration inhibited binding of IgE to wheat extract by less than 10%. On the other hand, wheat and barley extracts equally inhibited binding to barley sIgE at high concentrations. In the immunoblotting inhibition test, the spots of wheat were inhibited but weakly by barley extracts, and most of the spots of barley were inhibited even by low concentrations of the wheat and barley extract.
We showed that barley allergy associated with wheat allergy is caused by cross-reactivity from wheat. The OIT for wheat is one of the promising options for barley allergy.
据报道,一些小麦过敏患者对大麦表现出临床交叉反应性。然而,小麦过敏患者中大麦过敏的发生是否归因于小麦和大麦之间的交叉抗原性尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定小麦和大麦的临床交叉反应性及免疫交叉抗原性。
比较了9例小麦过敏患者在小麦口服免疫治疗(OIT)前后大麦口服食物激发试验(OFC)的结果,以评估小麦和大麦的临床交叉反应性。此外,我们使用7例对小麦和大麦过敏患者的血清进行了酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)抑制试验和免疫印迹抑制试验。
9例在小麦OIT前大麦-OFC结果为阳性的患者,在OIT后进行的大麦-OFC均为阴性。在ELISA抑制试验中,对小麦和大麦过敏患者的血清与高浓度大麦提取物预孵育后,IgE与小麦提取物的结合抑制率不到10%。另一方面,小麦和大麦提取物在高浓度时均能同等程度地抑制与大麦特异性IgE(sIgE)的结合。在免疫印迹抑制试验中,大麦提取物对小麦的条带抑制作用较弱,而低浓度的小麦和大麦提取物就能抑制大部分大麦的条带。
我们发现与小麦过敏相关的大麦过敏是由小麦的交叉反应引起的。小麦OIT是治疗大麦过敏的一种有前景的选择。