Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Oct;32(10):6859-6867. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08974-2. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
Vorticity calculated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) could assess the flow disturbance generated by coronary stenosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether vorticity would be an underlying cause of functionally significant stenosis assessed by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).
This retrospective study included 113 patients who underwent coronary CT angiography showing intermediate stenosis and subsequent invasive FFR between December 2015 and March 2020. Vorticity at the stenosis site was calculated using a mesh-free CFD method. We also evaluated the minimum lumen area (MLA) and diameter stenosis (DS) of the lesion. Invasive FFR of ≤ 0.80 was considered functionally significant. Data were compared using Student's t-test and logistic regression analysis was performed.
Of the evaluated 144 vessels, 53 vessels (37%) showed FFR ≤ 0.80. Vorticity of significant stenosis was significantly higher than non-significant stenosis (569 ± 78 vs. 328 ± 34 s, p < 0.001). A significant negative relationship was present between vorticity and invasive FFR (R = 0.31, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including MLA and DS showed that vorticity (per 100 s, odds ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.57, p < 0.001) was a statistically significant factor to detect functional significance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistically significantly increased when vorticity was combined with DS and MLA (0.76 vs. 0.87, p = 0.001).
Vorticity had a statistically significant negative relationship with invasive FFR independent of geometric stenosis.
• Flow disturbance caused by coronary stenosis could be evaluated by calculating vorticity which is defined as the norm of the rotation of the velocity vector. • Vorticity was statistically significantly higher in stenosis with functional significance than stenosis without. • Vorticity has an additive value to detect functionally significant stenosis over geometrical stenosis.
使用计算流体动力学(CFD)计算出的涡度可以评估冠状动脉狭窄引起的流动干扰。本研究旨在探讨涡度是否是通过有创血流储备分数(FFR)评估的功能性显著狭窄的潜在原因。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2015 年 12 月至 2020 年 3 月期间接受冠状动脉 CT 血管造影检查显示中度狭窄并随后进行有创 FFR 的 113 例患者。使用无网格 CFD 方法计算狭窄部位的涡度。我们还评估了病变的最小管腔面积(MLA)和直径狭窄(DS)。FFR < 0.80 被认为具有功能性意义。采用 Student's t 检验比较数据,并进行逻辑回归分析。
在评估的 144 个血管中,53 个血管(37%)FFR < 0.80。有功能意义的狭窄处的涡度明显高于无功能意义的狭窄处(569 ± 78 比 328 ± 34 s,p < 0.001)。涡度与有创 FFR 呈显著负相关(R = 0.31,p < 0.001)。包括 MLA 和 DS 的多变量逻辑回归分析表明,涡度(每 100 s,优势比:1.36,95%置信区间:1.21-1.57,p < 0.001)是检测功能意义的统计学显著因素。当将涡度与 DS 和 MLA 结合时,ROC 曲线下面积的统计学显著增加(0.76 比 0.87,p = 0.001)。
涡度与有创 FFR 呈显著负相关,独立于几何狭窄。
冠状动脉狭窄引起的流动干扰可以通过计算涡度来评估,涡度定义为速度矢量旋转的范数。
有功能意义的狭窄处的涡度明显高于无功能意义的狭窄处。
与几何狭窄相比,涡度对检测功能性显著狭窄具有附加价值。