• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合无烟立法对 106 个中等收入国家新生儿和婴儿死亡率的影响:一项合成控制研究。

Effect of comprehensive smoke-free legislation on neonatal mortality and infant mortality across 106 middle-income countries: a synthetic control study.

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Institute for Analytical Sociology, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2022 Jul;7(7):e616-e625. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00112-8.

DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00112-8
PMID:35779544
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are few quantitative studies into the effect of comprehensive smoke-free legislation on neonatal and infant mortality in middle-income countries. We aimed to estimate the effects of implementing comprehensive smoke-free legislation on neonatal mortality and infant mortality across all middle-income countries.

METHODS

We applied the synthetic control method using 1990-2018 country-level panel data for 106 middle-income countries from the WHO, World Bank, and Penn World datasets. Outcome variables were neonatal (age 0-28 days) mortality and infant (age 0-12 months) mortality rates per 1000 livebirths per year. For each middle-income country with comprehensive smoke-free legislation, a synthetic control country was constructed from middle-income countries without comprehensive smoke-free legislation, but with similar prelegislation trends in the outcome and predictor variables. Overall legislation effect was the mean average of country-specific effects weighted by the number of livebirths. We compared the distribution of the legislation effects with that of the placebo effects to assess the likelihood that the observed effect was related to the implementation of smoke-free legislation and not merely influenced by other processes.

FINDINGS

31 (29%) of 106 middle-income countries introduced comprehensive smoke-free legislation and had outcome data for at least 3 years after the intervention. We were able to construct a synthetic control country for 18 countries for neonatal mortality and for 15 countries for infant mortality. Comprehensive smoke-free legislation was followed by a mean yearly decrease of 1·63% in neonatal mortality and a mean yearly decrease of 1·33% in infant mortality. An estimated 12 392 neonatal deaths in 18 countries and 8932 infant deaths in 15 countries were avoided over 3 years following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free legislation. We estimated that an additional 104 063 infant deaths (including 95 850 neonatal deaths) could have been avoided over 3 years if the 72 control middle-income countries had introduced this legislation in 2015. 220 (43%) of 514 placebo effects for neonatal mortality and 112 (39%) of 289 for infant mortality were larger than the estimated aggregated legislation effect, indicating a degree of uncertainty around our estimates. Sensitivity analyses showed results that were consistent with the main analysis and suggested a dose-response association related to comprehensiveness of the legislation.

INTERPRETATION

Implementing comprehensive smoke-free legislation in middle-income countries could substantially reduce preventable deaths in neonates and infants.

FUNDING

Dutch Heart Foundation, Lung Foundation Netherlands, Dutch Cancer Society, Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation, Netherlands Thrombosis Foundation, Health Data Research UK.

摘要

背景

关于综合性无烟立法对中等收入国家新生儿和婴儿死亡率的影响,定量研究较少。我们旨在估计在所有中等收入国家实施综合性无烟立法对新生儿死亡率和婴儿死亡率的影响。

方法

我们使用来自世卫组织、世界银行和宾州世界数据集的 1990 年至 2018 年各国的面板数据,采用综合控制法。结果变量为新生儿(0-28 天)死亡率和婴儿(0-12 个月)死亡率,每年每 1000 例活产 1000 例。对于有综合性无烟立法的每个中等收入国家,从没有综合性无烟立法但结果和预测变量有类似立法前趋势的中等收入国家中,构建了一个合成对照国家。总体立法效果是按活产数加权的特定国家效果的平均值。我们将立法效果的分布与安慰剂效果的分布进行比较,以评估观察到的效果与实施无烟立法相关的可能性,而不仅仅受其他过程的影响。

结果

106 个中等收入国家中有 31 个(29%)实施了综合性无烟立法,并且干预后至少有 3 年的结果数据。我们能够为 18 个国家的新生儿死亡率和 15 个国家的婴儿死亡率构建一个合成对照国家。实施综合性无烟立法后,新生儿死亡率每年平均下降 1.63%,婴儿死亡率每年平均下降 1.33%。在实施综合性无烟立法后 3 年内,18 个国家估计避免了 12392 例新生儿死亡,15 个国家避免了 8932 例婴儿死亡。如果 2015 年 72 个对照中等收入国家实施了这项立法,估计在 3 年内还可以避免另外 104063 例婴儿死亡(包括 95850 例新生儿死亡)。220 项(43%)新生儿死亡率和 112 项(39%)婴儿死亡率的安慰剂效应大于估计的综合立法效应,表明我们的估计存在一定程度的不确定性。敏感性分析结果与主要分析一致,并表明与立法全面性相关的剂量反应关系。

解释

在中等收入国家实施综合性无烟立法可以显著减少新生儿和婴儿的可预防死亡。

资助

荷兰心脏基金会、荷兰肺脏基金会、荷兰癌症协会、荷兰糖尿病研究基金会、荷兰血栓形成基金会、英国健康数据研究。

相似文献

1
Effect of comprehensive smoke-free legislation on neonatal mortality and infant mortality across 106 middle-income countries: a synthetic control study.综合无烟立法对 106 个中等收入国家新生儿和婴儿死亡率的影响:一项合成控制研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Jul;7(7):e616-e625. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00112-8.
2
Investigating the effects of comprehensive smoke-free legislation on neonatal and infant mortality in Thailand using the synthetic control method.采用合成控制法研究泰国全面无烟立法对新生儿和婴儿死亡率的影响。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Oct 2;27:100560. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100560. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Smoke-free legislation and neonatal and infant mortality in Brazil: longitudinal quasi-experimental study.无烟立法与巴西新生儿和婴儿死亡率:纵向准实验研究。
Tob Control. 2020 May;29(3):312-319. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054923. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Cost and cost-effectiveness of newborn home visits: findings from the Newhints cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Ghana.新生儿家访的成本和成本效益:加纳农村 Newhints 集群随机对照试验的结果。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Jan;4(1):e45-56. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00207-7. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
5
A population-based, multifaceted strategy to implement antenatal corticosteroid treatment versus standard care for the reduction of neonatal mortality due to preterm birth in low-income and middle-income countries: the ACT cluster-randomised trial.一项基于人群的、多方面的策略,旨在实施产前皮质类固醇治疗与标准护理,以降低低收入和中等收入国家因早产导致的新生儿死亡率:ACT 整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):629-639. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61651-2. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
6
Population-based rates, timing, and causes of maternal deaths, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country prospective cohort study.南亚和撒哈拉以南非洲地区基于人群的孕产妇死亡、死产和新生儿死亡的发生率、时间和原因:一项多国前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Dec;6(12):e1297-e1308. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30385-1. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Effectiveness of 4% chlorhexidine umbilical cord care on neonatal mortality in Southern Province, Zambia (ZamCAT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.赞比亚南方省 4%洗必泰脐带护理对新生儿死亡率的影响(ZamCAT):一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e827-e836. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30215-7. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
8
National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis.1990 年至 2017 年期间,国家、地区和全球各级以及新生儿死亡率的趋势,并基于情景预测到 2030 年:系统分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jun;7(6):e710-e720. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30163-9.
9
Patterns in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: projections of neonatal and under-5 mortality to 2035.孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施覆盖情况的模式:到 2035 年对新生儿和 5 岁以下儿童死亡率的预测。
Lancet. 2013 Sep 21;382(9897):1029-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61748-1.
10
Estimates of burden and consequences of infants born small for gestational age in low and middle income countries with INTERGROWTH-21 standard: analysis of CHERG datasets.采用INTERGROWTH-21标准对低收入和中等收入国家小于胎龄儿的负担及后果进行评估:CHERG数据集分析
BMJ. 2017 Aug 17;358:j3677. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3677.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological and sociodemographic transitions in the global burden and risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a secondary analysis of GBD 2021.全球阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症的负担和风险因素中的流行病学及社会人口学转变:全球疾病负担研究2021的二次分析
Int J Equity Health. 2025 May 24;24(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02530-2.