Suppr超能文献

大体解剖模型在基于模拟的病理学学习中的应用。

The utility of a gross dissection anatomical model for simulation-based learning in pathology.

机构信息

Pathology Department, Morales Meseguer University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Loyola University, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Rev Esp Patol. 2022 Jul-Sep;55(3):149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 May 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The examination of morphological alterations in tissues is fundamental in Pathology. Traditional training in gross dissection has several limitations, including the risk of transmissible diseases, formaldehyde exposure and limited specimen availability. We describe a teaching method using anatomical simulators.

METHODS

Liquid silicone-based artisan neoplastic anatomical models were used in conjunction with clinical scenarios. Eighty-five medical students participated in a gross dissection experience and were asked to complete a feedback questionnaire. Additionally, a workshop was organized for students to compare three different teaching methods. The first one used still images (Group1-G1), the second a video explanation (Group2-G2), and the third directly observed a pathologist while grossing (Group3-G3).

RESULTS

The knowledge acquisition questionnaire showed an average value of 4.4 out of 5 (1-5) (range 3.4-4.7, σ0.89). The categories 'knowledge of resection margins' and 'macroscopic diagnosis' received the highest values (4.8, σ0.11 and 4.7, σ0.32, respectively), followed by 'understanding of handling and gross examination of the surgical specimen' (4.5, σ0.49), 'prognosis' (4.3, σ0.67) and 'understanding of a tumor resection' (3.9, σ0.96) (p<0.05). Regarding teaching methods, G3 spent less time than G2 and G1 with mean times of 15'39″ (σ2'12″), 16'50″ (σ3'45″), and 17'52″ (σ2'12″), respectively (p<0.05). Gross dissection marks (0-5) showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05). G2 obtained better results (3.7;σ0.54) than G3 (3.4;σ0.94) or G1 (3.1;σ0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study demonstrates that it is possible to implement a gross dissection simulation module at medical school and thus enable the acquisition of skills in a secure environment.

摘要

简介

组织形态学改变的检查是病理学的基础。传统的大体解剖训练有几个局限性,包括传染病传播的风险、甲醛暴露和有限的标本可用性。我们描述了一种使用解剖模拟器的教学方法。

方法

使用液态硅基人工肿瘤解剖模型,并结合临床情况。85 名医学生参与了大体解剖体验,并被要求完成一份反馈问卷。此外,还为学生组织了一个研讨会,比较三种不同的教学方法。第一种方法使用静态图像(第 1 组-G1),第二种方法使用视频解释(第 2 组-G2),第三种方法直接观察病理学家进行大体解剖(第 3 组-G3)。

结果

知识获取问卷显示平均得分为 5 分制中的 4.4 分(范围 3.4-4.7,σ0.89)。“切缘知识”和“大体诊断”这两个类别得分最高(分别为 4.8,σ0.11 和 4.7,σ0.32),其次是“手术标本处理和大体检查的理解”(4.5,σ0.49)、“预后”(4.3,σ0.67)和“肿瘤切除的理解”(3.9,σ0.96)(p<0.05)。关于教学方法,G3 花费的时间比 G2 和 G1 少,平均时间分别为 15'39″(σ2'12″)、16'50″(σ3'45″)和 17'52″(σ2'12″)(p<0.05)。大体解剖评分(0-5)有统计学差异(p<0.05)。G2 的得分(3.7;σ0.54)优于 G3(3.4;σ0.94)或 G1(3.1;σ0.8)。

结论

这项初步研究表明,在医学院实施大体解剖模拟模块是可行的,从而能够在安全的环境中获得技能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验