Anesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV 16, Genoa, Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Aug;48(8):1024-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06756-4. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
The optimal ventilatory settings in patients after cardiac arrest and their association with outcome remain unclear. The aim of this study was to describe the ventilatory settings applied in the first 72 h of mechanical ventilation in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and their association with 6-month outcomes.
Preplanned sub-analysis of the Target Temperature Management-2 trial. Clinical outcomes were mortality and functional status (assessed by the Modified Rankin Scale) 6 months after randomization.
A total of 1848 patients were included (mean age 64 [Standard Deviation, SD = 14] years). At 6 months, 950 (51%) patients were alive and 898 (49%) were dead. Median tidal volume (V) was 7 (Interquartile range, IQR = 6.2-8.5) mL per Predicted Body Weight (PBW), positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) was 7 (IQR = 5-9) cmH0, plateau pressure was 20 cmH0 (IQR = 17-23), driving pressure was 12 cmH0 (IQR = 10-15), mechanical power 16.2 J/min (IQR = 12.1-21.8), ventilatory ratio was 1.27 (IQR = 1.04-1.6), and respiratory rate was 17 breaths/minute (IQR = 14-20). Median partial pressure of oxygen was 87 mmHg (IQR = 75-105), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide was 40.5 mmHg (IQR = 36-45.7). Respiratory rate, driving pressure, and mechanical power were independently associated with 6-month mortality (omnibus p-values for their non-linear trajectories: p < 0.0001, p = 0.026, and p = 0.029, respectively). Respiratory rate and driving pressure were also independently associated with poor neurological outcome (odds ratio, OR = 1.035, 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.003-1.068, p = 0.030, and OR = 1.005, 95% CI = 1.001-1.036, p = 0.048). A composite formula calculated as [(4*driving pressure) + respiratory rate] was independently associated with mortality and poor neurological outcome.
Protective ventilation strategies are commonly applied in patients after cardiac arrest. Ventilator settings in the first 72 h after hospital admission, in particular driving pressure and respiratory rate, may influence 6-month outcomes.
心脏骤停后患者的最佳通气设置及其与预后的关系仍不清楚。本研究的目的是描述心脏骤停后患者机械通气最初 72 小时内应用的通气设置及其与 6 个月结局的关系。
目标温度管理-2 试验的预设亚分析。随机分组后 6 个月的临床结局为死亡率和功能状态(采用改良 Rankin 量表评估)。
共纳入 1848 例患者(平均年龄 64 [标准差,SD=14]岁)。6 个月时,950 例(51%)患者存活,898 例(49%)患者死亡。潮气量(V)中位数为 7(四分位距,IQR=6.2-8.5)mL 预测体重(PBW),呼气末正压(PEEP)为 7(IQR=5-9)cmH0,平台压为 20 cmH0(IQR=17-23),驱动压为 12 cmH0(IQR=10-15),机械功率为 16.2 J/min(IQR=12.1-21.8),通气比为 1.27(IQR=1.04-1.6),呼吸频率为 17 次/分钟(IQR=14-20)。氧分压中位数为 87 mmHg(IQR=75-105),二氧化碳分压为 40.5 mmHg(IQR=36-45.7)。呼吸频率、驱动压和机械功率与 6 个月死亡率独立相关(非线性格式检验的总体 p 值:p<0.0001、p=0.026 和 p=0.029)。呼吸频率和驱动压也与不良神经结局独立相关(比值比,OR=1.035,95%置信区间,CI=1.003-1.068,p=0.030 和 OR=1.005,95% CI=1.001-1.036,p=0.048)。作为(4×驱动压+呼吸频率)的复合公式与死亡率和不良神经结局独立相关。
心脏骤停后患者通常采用保护性通气策略。入院后最初 72 小时的呼吸机设置,特别是驱动压和呼吸频率,可能会影响 6 个月的结局。