Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Isala, P.O. Box 10400, 8000 GK Zwolle, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Emergency Medicine, Isala, P.O. Box 10400, 8000 GK Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Isala, P.O. Box 10400, 8000 GK Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Sep;154:110414. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110414. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
To investigate whether the image quality of a specific deep learning-based synthetic CT (sCT) of the cervical spine is noninferior to conventional CT.
Paired MRI and CT data were collected from 25 consecutive participants (≥ 50 years) with cervical radiculopathy. The MRI exam included a T1-weighted multiple gradient echo sequence for sCT reconstruction. For qualitative image assessment, four structures at two vertebral levels were evaluated on sCT and compared with CT by three assessors using a four-point scale (range 1-4). The noninferiority margin was set at 0.5 point on this scale. Additionally, acceptable image quality was defined as a score of 3-4 in ≥ 80% of the scans. Quantitative assessment included geometrical analysis and voxelwise comparisons.
Qualitative image assessment showed that sCT was noninferior to CT for overall bone image quality, artifacts, imaging of intervertebral joints and neural foramina at levels C3-C4 and C6-C7, and cortical delineation at C6-C7. Noninferiority was weak to absent for cortical delineation at level C3-C4 and trabecular bone at both levels. Acceptable image quality was achieved for all structures in sCT and CT, except for trabecular bone in sCT and level C6-C7 in CT. Geometrical analysis of the sCT showed good to excellent agreement with CT. Voxelwise comparisons showed a mean absolute error of 80.05 (±6.12) HU, dice similarity coefficient (cortical bone) of 0.84 (±0.04) and structural similarity index of 0.86 (±0.02).
This deep learning-based sCT was noninferior to conventional CT for the general visualization of bony structures of the cervical spine, artifacts, and most detailed structure assessments.
研究特定基于深度学习的颈椎合成 CT(sCT)的图像质量是否不劣于常规 CT。
从 25 名连续患有颈椎病的参与者中采集配对的 MRI 和 CT 数据。MRI 检查包括用于 sCT 重建的 T1 加权多梯度回波序列。对于定性图像评估,由三名评估员使用四点量表(范围 1-4)评估两个椎骨水平的四个结构在 sCT 上与 CT 的比较。该尺度的非劣效性边界设定为 0.5 分。此外,可接受的图像质量定义为在≥80%的扫描中评分 3-4。定量评估包括几何分析和体素比较。
定性图像评估显示,sCT 在整体骨图像质量、伪影、C3-C4 和 C6-C7 水平的椎间关节和神经孔以及 C6-C7 处的皮质描绘方面不劣于 CT。C3-C4 水平的皮质描绘和两个水平的小梁骨的非劣效性较弱或不存在。sCT 中所有结构均达到可接受的图像质量,除了 sCT 中的小梁骨和 CT 中的 C6-C7 水平。sCT 的几何分析显示与 CT 具有良好至优秀的一致性。体素比较显示平均绝对误差为 80.05(±6.12)HU,皮质骨的骰子相似系数(dice similarity coefficient,Dice)为 0.84(±0.04),结构相似性指数(structural similarity index,SSIM)为 0.86(±0.02)。
这种基于深度学习的 sCT 在颈椎骨结构的一般可视化、伪影和大多数详细结构评估方面不劣于常规 CT。