Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Population Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;10:653433. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.653433. eCollection 2022.
Early women's marriage is associated with adverse outcomes for mothers and their offspring, including reduced human capital and increased child undernutrition and mortality. Despite preventive efforts, it remains common in many populations and is often favored by cultural norms. A key question is why it remains common, given such penalties. Using an evolutionary perspective, a simple mathematical model was developed to explore women's optimal marriage age under different circumstances, if the sole aim were to maximize maternal or paternal lifetime reproductive fitness (surviving offspring).
The model was based on several assumptions, supported by empirical evidence, regarding relationships between women's marital age and parental and offspring outcomes. It assumes that later marriage promotes women's autonomy, enhancing control over fertility and childcare, but increases paternity uncertainty. Given these assumptions, optimal marriage ages for maximizing maternal and paternal fitness were calculated. The basic model was then used to simulate environmental changes or public health interventions, including shifts in child mortality, suppression of women's autonomy, or promoting women's contraception or education.
In the basic model, paternal fitness is maximized at lower women's marriage age than is maternal fitness, with the paternal optimum worsening child undernutrition and mortality. A family planning intervention delays marriage age and reduces child mortality and undernutrition, at a cost to paternal but not maternal fitness. Reductions in child mortality favor earlier marriage but increase child undernutrition, whereas ecological shocks that increase child mortality favor later marriage but reduce fitness of both parents. An education intervention favors later marriage and reduces child mortality and undernutrition, but at a cost to paternal fitness. Efforts to suppress maternal autonomy substantially increase fitness of both parents, but only if other members of the household provide compensatory childcare.
Early women's marriage maximizes paternal fitness despite relatively high child mortality and undernutrition, by increasing fertility and reducing paternity uncertainty. This tension between the sexes over the optimal marriage age is sensitive to ecological stresses or interventions. Education interventions seem most likely to improve maternal and child outcomes, but may be resisted by males and their kin as they may reduce paternal fitness.
女性早婚与母亲及其后代的不良后果有关,包括人力资本减少以及儿童营养不足和死亡率增加。尽管采取了预防措施,但在许多人群中这种情况仍然很常见,而且往往受到文化规范的青睐。一个关键问题是,考虑到这些惩罚,为什么它仍然很常见。本文从进化的角度出发,建立了一个简单的数学模型,以探讨在不同情况下女性的最佳结婚年龄,如果唯一的目的是最大限度地提高母亲或父亲的终身生殖适应性(存活后代)。
该模型基于一些假设,这些假设得到了关于女性婚姻年龄与父母和子女结果之间关系的经验证据的支持。它假设晚婚可以促进女性的自主权,增强其对生育和育儿的控制,但会增加父亲身份的不确定性。基于这些假设,计算了最大限度地提高母亲和父亲适应性的最佳结婚年龄。然后,使用基本模型来模拟环境变化或公共卫生干预,包括儿童死亡率的变化、对女性自主权的抑制,或促进女性避孕或教育。
在基本模型中,与母亲的适应性相比,父亲的适应性在较低的女性结婚年龄时达到最大化,而父亲的最佳选择会恶化儿童营养不足和死亡率。计划生育干预会延迟结婚年龄并降低儿童死亡率和营养不足,但会以牺牲父亲的适应性为代价。儿童死亡率的降低有利于早婚,但会增加儿童营养不足,而增加儿童死亡率的生态冲击有利于晚婚,但会降低父母双方的适应性。教育干预有利于晚婚,并降低儿童死亡率和营养不足,但会以牺牲父亲的适应性为代价。抑制母亲的自主权会极大地提高父母双方的适应性,但前提是家庭中的其他成员提供补偿性的育儿服务。
尽管儿童死亡率和营养不足相对较高,但女性早婚通过提高生育率和降低父亲身份的不确定性,最大限度地提高了父亲的适应性。这种两性之间对最佳结婚年龄的紧张关系对生态压力或干预措施很敏感。教育干预似乎最有可能改善母婴结果,但可能会受到男性及其亲属的抵制,因为这可能会降低父亲的适应性。