• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An evaluation of case management.病例管理评估。
Am J Public Health. 1987 Jun;77(6):674-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.6.674.
2
Evaluation of intensive case management for seriously and persistently mentally ill persons.对严重且持续性精神疾病患者的强化个案管理评估。
J Case Manag. 1993 Summer;2(2):59-65.
3
Pursuing cost-effectiveness in mental health service delivery for youth with complex needs.为有复杂需求的青少年提供心理健康服务时追求成本效益。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Jun;14(2):73-83.
4
Balancing hospital and community treatment: effectiveness of an extended-hours community mental health team in a semi-rural region of australia.平衡医院与社区治疗:澳大利亚半农村地区延长工作时间的社区心理健康团队的成效
Aust J Rural Health. 2003 Aug;11(4):181-6.
5
An empirical evaluation of recovery transformation at a large community psychiatric rehabilitation organization.大型社区精神康复机构康复转型的实证评估。
Psychol Serv. 2013 Nov;10(4):428-41. doi: 10.1037/a0032747. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
6
Care management, dementia care and specialist mental health services: an evaluation.护理管理、痴呆症护理与专科心理健康服务:一项评估
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;17(4):315-25. doi: 10.1002/gps.595.
7
Case management for people with severe mental disorders.严重精神障碍患者的病例管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000050.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of integrated care for people with HIV, chronic mental illness and substance abuse disorders.针对感染艾滋病毒、患有慢性精神疾病和药物滥用障碍患者的综合护理成本效益分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009 Mar;12(1):33-46.
9
The effect of brief case management on emergency department use of frequent users in mental health: Findings of a randomized controlled trial.简短个案管理对精神卫生领域频繁就诊者急诊科使用情况的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182157. eCollection 2017.
10
Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental disorders.针对严重精神障碍患者的积极社区治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001089.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Community-Based Intensive Case Management Model on Reducing Hospitalization for People With Severe Mental Illness in Seoul.基于社区的强化个案管理模式对减少首尔严重精神疾病患者住院率的效果。
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Dec;20(12):1133-1141. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0152. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
2
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.严重精神疾病的强化个案管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 6;1(1):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub3.
3
Supportive therapy for schizophrenia.精神分裂症的支持性治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 14;2015(4):CD004716. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004716.pub4.
4
Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies for coordination of care to reduce use of health care services: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善医疗服务协调以减少医疗服务使用的质量改进策略的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2014 Oct 21;186(15):E568-78. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140289. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
5
Community service models for schizophrenia: evidence-based implications and future directions.精神分裂症的社区服务模式:基于证据的启示与未来方向。
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2005 Feb;2(2):24-30.
6
Elderly patients with schizophrenia and depression: diagnosis and treatment.老年精神分裂症和抑郁症患者:诊断与治疗
Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2011 Jan;4(4):239-50. doi: 10.3371/CSRP.4.4.4.
7
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.严重精神疾病的强化个案管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub2.
8
Co-occurring depressive symptoms in the older patient with schizophrenia.老年精神分裂症患者中同时出现的抑郁症状。
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(8):631-47. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200825080-00002.
9
Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality.为患有严重精神疾病和人格障碍者设立的社区心理健康团队。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD000270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000270.pub2.
10
Effective components of a nationwide case management program in Japan for individuals with severe mental illness.
Community Ment Health J. 2004 Dec;40(6):525-37. doi: 10.1007/s10597-004-6126-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of psychiatric symptoms on quality of life assessments among the chronic mentally ill.精神症状对慢性精神病患者生活质量评估的影响。
Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(2):143-51. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90028-9.
2
What did we really expect from deinstitutionalization?我们对去机构化究竟期望什么?
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1981 Feb;32(2):105-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.32.2.105.
3
Improving the quality of community care for the chronically mentally disabled: the role of case management.提高慢性精神残疾者的社区护理质量:个案管理的作用。
Schizophr Bull. 1982;8(4):655-74. doi: 10.1093/schbul/8.4.655.
4
The well-being of chronic mental patients.慢性精神病患者的福祉。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Apr;40(4):369-73. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790040023003.
5
The affect balance scale: a validity study with aged samples.情感平衡量表:一项针对老年样本的效度研究。
J Gerontol. 1974 Jan;29(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/geronj/29.1.73.

病例管理评估。

An evaluation of case management.

作者信息

Franklin J L, Solovitz B, Mason M, Clemons J R, Miller G E

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1987 Jun;77(6):674-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.6.674.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.77.6.674
PMID:3578614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1647077/
Abstract

This project explores the efficiency and effectiveness of case management as compared with the usual and customary services available to chronic mentally ill individuals in reducing readmissions to mental hospitals and improving the quality of life. A randomized pretest-posttest control group design was used to assign 417 individuals who had at least two discharges from a mental hospital to an experimental (E) group (N = 213) to receive case management services and a control (C) group (N = 204) who could receive any services but case management. After participation in the project for 12 months, 138 members of the E group and 126 members of the C group were reinterviewed. The E group received more services, cost more to maintain, and were admitted to mental hospitals more often, but concomitant improvement in quality of life indicators was not evident. Alternative explanations for the findings are discussed.

摘要

本项目探讨了病例管理与慢性精神病患者可获得的常规服务相比,在减少再次入住精神病院及改善生活质量方面的效率和效果。采用随机前测-后测对照组设计,将至少有两次从精神病院出院记录的417名个体分配到实验组(E组,N = 213)接受病例管理服务,以及对照组(C组,N = 204),后者可接受除病例管理之外的任何服务。在参与项目12个月后,对E组的138名成员和C组的126名成员进行了再次访谈。E组接受了更多服务,维持成本更高,且更频繁地入住精神病院,但生活质量指标并未随之出现明显改善。文中讨论了这些研究结果的其他解释。