• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在日本,HER2 阴性、不可切除的晚期或复发性胃癌或胃食管交界处癌患者中,一线与三线或更后线纳武利尤单抗治疗的成本效益差异。

Difference in Cost-Effectiveness between First-Line and Third-Line or Later Nivolumab Therapy in Patients with HER2-Negative, Unresectable, Advanced or Recurrent Gastric or Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancer in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Healthcare Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University.

出版信息

Biol Pharm Bull. 2022;45(7):895-903. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b22-00150.

DOI:10.1248/bpb.b22-00150
PMID:35786597
Abstract

A model-based, cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to evaluate the difference in cost-effectiveness of nivolumab (NIVO), between first-line therapy in combination with chemotherapy and third-line or later monotherapy for patients with unresectable, advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer, with the aim of supporting the economic evaluation of healthcare in Japan. Data on overall survival and progression-free survival were obtained from the phase 3 clinical trials, ATTRACTION-4 and ATTRACTION-2. A partitioned survival model was developed to predict costs and outcomes. Direct medical costs were considered from the perspective of the Japanese national health insurance (NHI) payer. The model time horizon was set to 10 years. Health outcomes were defined as life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of NIVO compared to the control group was estimated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of parameter setting. A willingness-to-pay threshold of 15 million JPY (Japanese yen) was used. Compared to each control group, the ICERs for NIVO treatment per 1 LY gained were 65745714 JPY for first-line treatment, 7420202 JPY for third-line or later treatment, and 74750097 JPY and 10496602 JPY per QALY gained, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses estimated that the probability of NIVO treatment being cost-effective for first-line and third-line treatment was 23.5 and 74.3%, respectively. From the perspective of the Japanese NHI payer, NIVO was cost-effective as third-line or later monotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer, but not in combination with first-line chemotherapy.

摘要

进行了一项基于模型的成本效果分析,旨在评估不可切除的晚期或复发性胃或胃食管连接部癌患者一线联合化疗与三线或后线单药治疗中纳武利尤单抗(NIVO)的成本效果差异,以支持日本卫生保健的经济评估。总生存期和无进展生存期数据来自 3 期临床试验 ATTRACTION-4 和 ATTRACTION-2。建立了一个分区生存模型来预测成本和结果。从日本国民健康保险(NHI)支付者的角度考虑了直接医疗成本。模型时间范围设定为 10 年。健康结果定义为获得的生命年(LYs)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。与对照组相比,估计了 NIVO 的增量成本效果比(ICER)。进行了敏感性分析以评估参数设置的不确定性。使用了 1500 万日元(日元)的意愿支付阈值。与每个对照组相比,NIVO 治疗每获得 1 LY 的增量成本效果比分别为一线治疗 65745714 日元、三线或后线治疗 7420202 日元,三线或后线治疗 74750097 日元和 10496602 日元/QALY。概率敏感性分析估计,一线和三线治疗中 NIVO 治疗具有成本效果的概率分别为 23.5%和 74.3%。从日本 NHI 支付者的角度来看,对于晚期胃癌患者,NIVO 作为三线或后线单药治疗具有成本效果,但与一线化疗联合使用则不具有成本效果。

相似文献

1
Difference in Cost-Effectiveness between First-Line and Third-Line or Later Nivolumab Therapy in Patients with HER2-Negative, Unresectable, Advanced or Recurrent Gastric or Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancer in Japan.在日本,HER2 阴性、不可切除的晚期或复发性胃癌或胃食管交界处癌患者中,一线与三线或更后线纳武利尤单抗治疗的成本效益差异。
Biol Pharm Bull. 2022;45(7):895-903. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b22-00150.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy for patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction or esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan.日本不可切除的晚期或转移性 HER2 阴性胃或胃食管交界处或食管腺癌患者中纳武利尤单抗联合化疗与化疗的成本效益分析。
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec;58(12):1188-1197. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02041-3. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
3
Comparative cost-effectiveness of nivolumab first-line and second-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer in Japan.纳武利尤单抗一线与二线治疗日本晚期食管癌的成本效果比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Apr;25(3):459-470. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01602-w. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Combination Therapy as First-line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in Japan.尼伏鲁单抗联合伊匹单抗联合治疗作为晚期肾细胞癌一线治疗在日本的成本效果分析。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2024 Mar;40:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.11.003. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.在美国,nivolumab 联合 ipilimumab 加两个周期铂类双药化疗对比单纯铂类双药化疗一线治疗 IV 期或复发性非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):660-668. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2048573.
6
Economic evaluation of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in Japan.尼伏单抗联合伊匹单抗一线治疗日本晚期黑色素瘤的经济学评价。
J Med Econ. 2020 Dec;23(12):1542-1552. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1830781. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus standard chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the first-line treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.纳武利尤单抗联合标准化疗与单纯化疗用于一线治疗不可切除的晚期或转移性胃癌、胃食管交界癌和食管腺癌的成本效益分析
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Apr;44(2):499-506. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01372-6. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.在美国,nivolumab 联合 ipilimumab 对比铂类双药化疗用于 IV 期或复发性非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):703-711. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2077549.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Paclitaxel + Ramucirumab Combination Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer Progressing After First-line Chemotherapy in Japan.紫杉醇+雷莫芦单抗联合治疗方案用于日本一线化疗后进展的晚期胃癌的成本效益分析。
Clin Ther. 2017 Dec;39(12):2380-2388. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil against nivolumab for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in Japan.替氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶对比纳武利尤单抗治疗日本晚期转移性胃癌的成本效果分析。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 30;51(9):1383-1390. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyab086.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗治疗HER2阴性晚期胃癌/胃食管交界癌:一项成本效益分析。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 2;16:17562848231207200. doi: 10.1177/17562848231207200. eCollection 2023.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy for patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction or esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan.日本不可切除的晚期或转移性 HER2 阴性胃或胃食管交界处或食管腺癌患者中纳武利尤单抗联合化疗与化疗的成本效益分析。
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec;58(12):1188-1197. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02041-3. Epub 2023 Sep 19.