Dandu Naveen K, Assary Rajeev S, Redfern Paul C, Ward Logan, Foster Ian, Curtiss Larry A
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439 United States.
Joint Center for Energy Storage Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439 United States.
J Phys Chem A. 2022 Jul 14;126(27):4528-4536. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c01327. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
G4MP2 theory has proven to be a reliable and accurate quantum chemical composite method for the calculation of molecular energies using an approximation based on second-order perturbation theory to lower computational costs compared to G4 theory. However, it has been found to have significantly increased errors when applied to larger organic molecules with 10 or more nonhydrogen atoms. We report here on an investigation of the cause of the failure of G4MP2 theory for such larger molecules. One source of error is found to be the "higher-level correction (HLC)", which is meant to correct for deficiencies in correlation contributions to the calculated energies. This is because the HLC assumes that the contribution is independent of the element and the type of bonding involved, both of which become more important with larger molecules. We address this problem by adding an atom-specific correction, dependent on atom type but not bond type, to the higher-level correction. We find that a G4MP2 method that incorporates this modification of the higher-level correction, referred to as G4MP2A, becomes as accurate as G4 theory (for computing enthalpies of formation) for a test set of molecules with less than 10 nonhydrogen atoms as well as a set with 10-14 such atoms, the set of molecules considered here, with a much lower computational cost. The G4MP2A method is also found to significantly improve ionization potentials and electron affinities. Finally, we implemented the G4MP2A energies in a machine learning method to predict molecular energies.
G4MP2理论已被证明是一种可靠且准确的量子化学复合方法,用于计算分子能量。它基于二阶微扰理论进行近似,与G4理论相比,可降低计算成本。然而,人们发现,当将其应用于具有10个或更多非氢原子的较大有机分子时,误差会显著增加。我们在此报告对G4MP2理论在这类较大分子上失效原因的研究。发现误差的一个来源是“高级校正(HLC)”,它旨在校正计算能量中相关贡献的不足。这是因为HLC假定该贡献与元素和所涉及的键型无关,而这两者在较大分子中变得更为重要。我们通过在高级校正中添加一个取决于原子类型而非键型的原子特定校正来解决这个问题。我们发现,对于一组少于10个非氢原子的分子以及一组具有10 - 14个此类原子(即本文所考虑的分子组)的测试集,一种纳入了这种高级校正修改的G4MP2方法(称为G4MP2A)在计算生成焓时与G4理论一样准确,且计算成本要低得多。还发现G4MP2A方法能显著提高电离势和电子亲和能。最后,我们在一种机器学习方法中实现了G4MP2A能量,以预测分子能量。