Suppr超能文献

前瞻性研究根治性外照射放疗与外照射放疗联合腔内近距离放疗治疗原发性食管癌。

A prospective study of radical external beam radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy combined with intraluminal brachytherapy for primary esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Brachytherapy. 2022 Sep-Oct;21(5):703-711. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study compared the efficacy and side effects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) with EBRT alone in patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2013 and 2020, 64 patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer without surgery received radiotherapy. Thirty-two patients received EBRT + IBT. EBRT dose was 50 Gy, 2 Gy/f, 5 times a week, and IBT dose was 10 Gy, 5 Gy/f, once a week. Thirty-two patients received EBRT alone, and the total dose was 60 Gy. The median followup was 19 months.

RESULTS

The local control rates (LCR) of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment were 88% and 72%, 53% and 22%, 25%, and 9%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) of the EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 3 years after treatment were 38% and 9%. The 3-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group were 25% and 9%. Univariate analysis showed that EBRT + IBT could be the prognostic factor improving OS (p = 0.04), and tumor located in the mid-thoracic region exhibited a poorer prognosis on LRFS (p = 0.03). Grade 3 or higher acute side effects included two cases of dysphagia and three cases of bone marrow suppression. Severe late side effects included three cases of fistula, three cases of radiation pneumonia, and five cases of stenosis requiring treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with EBRT alone, EBRT + IBT is an effective treatment modality for T1∼3NanyM0 primary thoracic esophageal cancer with good local control. It can prolong the survival time of patients and has acceptable toxicity.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了外照射放疗(EBRT)+腔内近距离放疗(IBT)与单纯 EBRT 治疗原发性胸段食管癌的疗效和副作用。

材料和方法

2013 年至 2020 年间,64 例未经手术的原发性胸段食管癌患者接受放疗。32 例患者接受 EBRT+IBT。EBRT 剂量为 50Gy,2Gy/f,每周 5 次,IBT 剂量为 10Gy,5Gy/f,每周 1 次。32 例患者接受单纯 EBRT,总剂量为 60Gy。中位随访时间为 19 个月。

结果

EBRT+IBT 和单纯 EBRT 组治疗后 1、2、3 年的局部控制率(LCR)分别为 88%和 72%、53%和 22%、25%和 9%。EBRT+IBT 和单纯 EBRT 组治疗后 3 年的总生存率(OS)分别为 38%和 9%。EBRT+IBT 和单纯 EBRT 组 3 年局部无复发生存率(LRFS)分别为 25%和 9%。单因素分析显示,EBRT+IBT 可作为改善 OS 的预后因素(p=0.04),肿瘤位于中胸段的患者 LRFS 较差(p=0.03)。3 级或以上急性不良反应包括吞咽困难 2 例,骨髓抑制 3 例。严重晚期不良反应包括瘘管 3 例、放射性肺炎 3 例、需要治疗的狭窄 5 例。

结论

与单纯 EBRT 相比,EBRT+IBT 是 T1∼3NanyM0 原发性胸段食管癌的有效治疗方法,局部控制效果好。它可以延长患者的生存时间,且毒性可接受。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验