• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反馈相关的 EEG 动态分别反映了决策参数、偏差和未来的选择。

Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choices.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany.

Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2022 Oct 1;259:119437. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119437. Epub 2022 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119437
PMID:35788041
Abstract

Optimal decision making in complex environments requires dynamic learning from unexpected events. To speed up learning, we should heavily weight information that indicates state-action-outcome contingency changes and ignore uninformative fluctuations in the environment. Often, however, unrelated information is hard to ignore and can potentially bias our learning. Here we used computational modelling and EEG to investigate learning behaviour in a modified probabilistic choice task that introduced two task-irrelevant factors that were uninformative for optimal task performance, but nevertheless could potentially bias learning: pay-out magnitudes were varied randomly and, occasionally, feedback presentation was enhanced by visual surprise. We found that participants' overall good learning performance was biased by distinct effects of these non-normative factors. On the neural level, these parameters are represented in a dynamic and spatiotemporally dissociable sequence of EEG activity. Later in feedback processing the different streams converged on a central to centroparietal positivity reflecting a signal that is interpreted by downstream learning processes that adjust future behaviour.

摘要

在复杂环境中进行最优决策需要根据意外事件进行动态学习。为了加快学习速度,我们应该高度重视表明状态-动作-结果关联变化的信息,而忽略环境中无信息的波动。然而,通常情况下,无关信息很难被忽略,并且可能会对我们的学习产生偏差。在这里,我们使用计算建模和 EEG 研究了在修改后的概率选择任务中学习行为,该任务引入了两个与任务无关的因素,这些因素对最佳任务表现没有信息作用,但仍然可能会对学习产生偏差:收益幅度随机变化,并且偶尔会通过视觉惊喜增强反馈呈现。我们发现,参与者整体良好的学习表现受到这些非规范因素的不同影响的影响。在神经水平上,这些参数以 EEG 活动的动态和时空可分离序列表示。在反馈处理的后期,不同的流汇聚在一个中央到中央顶正性上,反映了一个信号,该信号由下游学习过程解释,从而调整未来的行为。

相似文献

1
Feedback-related EEG dynamics separately reflect decision parameters, biases, and future choices.反馈相关的 EEG 动态分别反映了决策参数、偏差和未来的选择。
Neuroimage. 2022 Oct 1;259:119437. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119437. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
2
The Good, the Bad, and the Irrelevant: Neural Mechanisms of Learning Real and Hypothetical Rewards and Effort.善、恶与无关因素:学习真实与假设奖励及努力的神经机制
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 12;35(32):11233-51. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0396-15.2015.
3
Common and distinct electrophysiological correlates of feedback processing during risky and ambiguous decision making.风险和不确定决策中反馈处理的常见和独特电生理相关性。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Sep;146:107526. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107526. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
4
Choice modulates the neural dynamics of prediction error processing during rewarded learning.选择调节奖励学习过程中预测误差处理的神经动力学。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.051. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
5
EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning.脑电图对强化学习过程中体力消耗和奖励处理的相关性研究。
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Aug 1;124(2):610-622. doi: 10.1152/jn.00370.2020. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
6
Individual Neurons in the Cingulate Cortex Encode Action Monitoring, Not Selection, during Adaptive Decision-Making.扣带皮层中的单个神经元在自适应决策过程中编码的是动作监控,而不是选择。
J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 21;39(34):6668-6683. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0159-19.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus-reward associations.感觉皮层对刺激特异性更新在学习刺激-奖励关联中的关键作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):173-187. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy116.
8
Temporal dynamics of prediction error processing during reward-based decision making.基于奖励的决策过程中预测误差处理的时间动态。
Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):221-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.052. Epub 2010 May 25.
9
Learning what matters: A neural explanation for the sparsity bias.学习重要的东西:稀疏偏差的神经解释。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 May;127:62-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
State anxiety biases estimates of uncertainty and impairs reward learning in volatile environments.状态焦虑会影响不确定性的估计,并在不稳定的环境中损害奖励学习。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117424. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117424. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Methamphetamine-induced adaptation of learning rate dynamics depend on baseline performance.甲基苯丙胺引起的学习率动态适应性取决于基线表现。
Elife. 2025 Jul 21;13:RP101413. doi: 10.7554/eLife.101413.
2
The cerebellum contributes to prediction error coding in reinforcement learning in humans.小脑有助于人类强化学习中的预测误差编码。
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 26;45(19). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1972-24.2025.
3
Methamphetamine-induced adaptation of learning rate dynamics depend on baseline performance.甲基苯丙胺引起的学习率动态变化适应性取决于基线表现。
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 20:2024.07.04.602054. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.04.602054.
4
An EEG Dataset of Neural Signatures in a Competitive Two-Player Game Encouraging Deceptive Behavior.鼓励欺骗行为的竞争性二人游戏中的神经特征 EEG 数据集。
Sci Data. 2024 Apr 16;11(1):389. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03234-y.
5
Transdiagnostic inflexible learning dynamics explain deficits in depression and schizophrenia.跨诊断不变性学习动力学解释了抑郁症和精神分裂症的缺陷。
Brain. 2024 Jan 4;147(1):201-214. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad362.
6
Unraveling the influence of trial-based motivational changes on performance monitoring stages in a flanker task.揭示基于试验的动机变化对侧抑制任务中绩效监测阶段的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 6;13(1):19180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45526-0.