Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.
Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08259-w.
Sweden has provided around 300 youth clinics (YCs) to address the health needs of young people since the 1970s. During the last few years, and as part of an effort to strengthen mental healthcare for young people, YCs' role in the provision of mental healthcare has been widely debated. With such debates as background, the aim of this study is to analyse Swedish YCs' responses to the mental (ill) healthcare needs of young people, from the perspective of national level stakeholders.
We used thematic analysis of interviews with eight national level stakeholders in the field of youth mental health in Sweden. Building upon the concept of biomedicalization we examined the discourses on mental (ill) health, healthcare and youth that such responses reproduce.
YCs engage in the three simultaneous, but at times contradictory, responses of protecting, managing and bending boundaries. Remaining true to their mission as a health-promotion service compels them to protect their boundaries and limit the type of mental health issues they address. However, the perceived malfunctioning of specialized services has led them to bend these boundaries to allow in more young people with severe mental health problems. Caught between protecting and bending boundaries, the response of managing boundaries to decide who should be allowed in and who should be sent elsewhere has emerged as a middle-way response. However, it is not free from conflicts.
Building upon the concept of biomedicalization, this study poses two questions. The first relates to whether it is possible to support young people and their health without reinforcing discourses that represent young people as collectively at risk, and if so how this can be done. The second relates to the provision of mental healthcare for young people, and the need to identify conditions for integrating diagnosis and treatment within YCs, without hindering their holistic and youth-centred approach.
自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,瑞典已经提供了大约 300 家青年诊所(YC),以满足年轻人的健康需求。在过去几年中,作为加强年轻人心理健康护理工作的一部分,YC 在提供心理健康护理方面的作用引起了广泛的争论。在这样的争论背景下,本研究旨在从国家利益相关者的角度分析瑞典 YC 对年轻人心理健康(不适)需求的反应。
我们对瑞典青年心理健康领域的八位国家利益相关者进行了访谈,并采用主题分析。在生物医学化概念的基础上,我们考察了这些反应所再现的关于心理健康(不适)、医疗保健和青年的话语。
YC 同时进行三种反应,即保护、管理和跨越边界,但有时会相互矛盾。为了忠实于其作为促进健康服务的使命,他们必须保护自己的边界,并限制他们所处理的心理健康问题的类型。然而,专门服务机构运作失灵,迫使他们跨越这些边界,允许更多患有严重心理健康问题的年轻人进入。在保护和跨越边界之间,出现了一种中间反应,即管理边界以决定谁应该被允许进入,谁应该被送到其他地方。然而,它并非没有冲突。
在生物医学化概念的基础上,本研究提出了两个问题。第一个问题是,是否有可能在不强化将年轻人视为集体处于风险之中的话语的情况下支持年轻人及其健康,如果可以,应该如何做到这一点。第二个问题涉及为年轻人提供心理健康护理,以及需要确定在 YC 内整合诊断和治疗的条件,而不会阻碍其整体和以青年为中心的方法。