Nisha Zairu
Department of Philosophy, Ramanujan College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2022 Apr 22;14(3):271-285. doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00205-6. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Surrogacy is one of the desired reproductive technologies for family formation, yet surrogate mothers are subjected to unethical treatments and unbalanced power relations in India. Such treatment obscures women's free decision-making and can be detrimental to their maternal self. Recently, the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, has received the President's approval to regulate surrogacy practices by limiting them for the altruistic motives which have again provoked the burning debates regarding reproductive technologies, women's emancipation and procreative labour. The paper thus explores women's agency, maternal freedom and surrogate arrangements in Indian society. The complexity of the implementation of the law, vulnerability of surrogate labour, woman's bodily autonomy and reproductive choices have been analysed. This has been done through comprehensive feminist discussions on motherhood experience in terms of enforced vs. voluntary to find the way to protect women's freedom and subjectivity in the task of 'mothering as empowerment'.
代孕是组建家庭所期望的生殖技术之一,但在印度,代孕母亲遭受着不道德的对待以及权力关系的失衡。这种对待掩盖了女性的自由决策,可能对她们作为母亲的自我造成损害。最近,2021年《代孕(监管)法案》获得总统批准,通过将代孕限制在利他动机范围内来规范代孕行为,这再次引发了关于生殖技术、女性解放和生育劳动的激烈辩论。因此,本文探讨了印度社会中女性的能动性、母亲的自由以及代孕安排。分析了法律实施的复杂性、代孕劳动的脆弱性、女性的身体自主权和生殖选择。这是通过关于母亲经历的全面女权主义讨论来完成的,讨论内容涉及强制生育与自愿生育,以找到在“将母亲身份视为赋权”的任务中保护女性自由和主体性的方法。