Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Neurosurgery/Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Aug;37(6):1136-1153. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2022.2094834. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
This study examined how associations of self-reported concussion history and depression vary based on different variable characterizations. Former NFL players (=1,697) completed a General Health Survey, indicating the number of concussions they sustained during their football career and whether a physician had diagnosed them with depression, and the PROMIS 4-item Depression scale. Self-reported concussion history was characterized as: a 3-category variable (0, 1-2, 3+) with (1) indicator variables and (2) as an ordinal variable; a 5-category variable (0, 1-2, 3-5, 6-9, 10+) with (3) indicator variables and (4) as an ordinal variable; and (5) the original interval scale (0, 1, 2,…, 10, 10+). Depression was characterized as: (1) physician diagnosis (yes/no); and the PROMIS 4-item Depression scale treated as: (2) the original -score variable and (3) using a cut-off of a -score >60 versus ≤60. Regression models with various combinations of the characterizations, while adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, pain interference, and stress level, estimated prevalence ratios and mean differences for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. Concussion history-related effect estimates were compared across all models. Self-reported concussion history emerged as a significant predictor of each depression measure. With a higher number of concussions reported, be it via the categories or the interval scale, stronger associations between self-reported concussion history and depression were observed. The various approaches to characterize self-reported concussion history and depression provided evidence of significant associations between the two variables, with the degree of association varying based on characterization of each construct.
本研究考察了自我报告的脑震荡史和抑郁之间的关联如何因不同的变量特征而变化。前 NFL 球员(=1697)完成了一般健康调查,表明他们在足球生涯中遭受的脑震荡次数以及医生是否诊断他们患有抑郁症,以及 PROMIS 4 项抑郁量表。自我报告的脑震荡史的特征为:(1)有 3 个类别(0、1-2、3+)的变量,包括(1)指示变量和(2)有序变量;(2)5 个类别(0、1-2、3-5、6-9、10+)的变量,包括(3)指示变量和(4)有序变量;(5)原始区间量表(0、1、2、……、10、10+)。抑郁的特征为:(1)医生诊断(是/否);以及 PROMIS 4 项抑郁量表被处理为:(2)原始得分变量和(3)使用得分>60 与≤60 的分割点。在调整年龄、种族/民族、教育、疼痛干扰和压力水平后,各种特征组合的回归模型分别估计了二项和连续结果的患病率比和均值差异。在所有模型中比较了脑震荡史相关的效应估计值。自我报告的脑震荡史是每个抑郁测量的显著预测因子。随着报告的脑震荡次数的增加,无论是通过类别还是区间量表,自我报告的脑震荡史与抑郁之间的关联都更强。自我报告的脑震荡史和抑郁的各种特征化方法提供了这两个变量之间存在显著关联的证据,关联程度因每个结构的特征化方式而异。