• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Development of a taxonomy for characterising medical oncology-related patient safety and quality incidents: a novel approach.

作者信息

Jacobson Joseph O, Zerillo Jessica Ann, Mulvey Therese, Stuver Sherri O, Revette Anna C

机构信息

Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Jul;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001828.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001828
PMID:35793864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9260784/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f2/9260784/c09016d56c92/bmjoq-2022-001828f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f2/9260784/c09016d56c92/bmjoq-2022-001828f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f2/9260784/c09016d56c92/bmjoq-2022-001828f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a taxonomy for characterising medical oncology-related patient safety and quality incidents: a novel approach.制定用于描述肿瘤内科相关患者安全和质量事件的分类法：一种新方法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Jul;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001828.
2
Uncovering the Risks of Anticancer Therapy Through Incident Report Analysis Using a Newly Developed Medical Oncology Incident Taxonomy.通过使用新开发的肿瘤医学事件分类法对不良事件报告进行分析，揭示抗癌治疗的风险。
J Patient Saf. 2023 Dec 1;19(8):580-586. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001169. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
3
Characterising the nature of clinical incidents reported across a tertiary health service: a retrospective audit.描述一家三级保健服务机构报告的临床事件的性质：回顾性审计。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):447-454. doi: 10.1071/AH20271.
4
An error taxonomy system for analysis of haemodialysis incidents.用于分析血液透析事件的错误分类系统。
J Ren Care. 2014 Dec;40(4):239-48. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12081. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
5
Learning from Patient Safety Incidents in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.从急诊科的患者安全事件中学习：系统评价。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;58(2):234-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
6
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性？对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
7
Anonymous reporting of medical errors from The Egyptian Neonatal Safety Training Network.来自埃及新生儿安全培训网络的匿名医疗差错报告。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2020 Feb;61(1):31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 22.
8
Patient safety incidents in radiology: frequency and distribution of incident types.放射科的患者安全事件：事件类型的频率和分布。
Acta Radiol. 2021 May;62(5):653-666. doi: 10.1177/0284185120937386. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
9
Rates and reasons for safety incident reporting in the medical imaging department of a large academic health sciences centre.大型学术健康科学中心医学影像部门安全事件报告率及原因。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021 Mar;52(1):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
10
The effects and preventability of 2627 patient safety incidents related to health information technology failures: a retrospective analysis of 10 years of incident reporting in England and Wales.与医疗信息技术故障相关的 2627 起患者安全事件的影响和可预防措施：对英格兰和威尔士 10 年来事件报告的回顾性分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jul;1(3):e127-e135. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30057-3. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncovering the Risks of Anticancer Therapy Through Incident Report Analysis Using a Newly Developed Medical Oncology Incident Taxonomy.通过使用新开发的肿瘤医学事件分类法对不良事件报告进行分析，揭示抗癌治疗的风险。
J Patient Saf. 2023 Dec 1;19(8):580-586. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001169. Epub 2023 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Human factor associations with safety events in radiation therapy.人为因素与放射治疗中的安全事件的关联。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Oct;22(10):288-294. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13420. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
2
Suffering, Systems, and Safety: Applying the Principles of Systems Safety to Improve the Care of Patients With Cancer.痛苦、系统与安全：应用系统安全原则改善癌症患者护理
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Mar;16(3):115-120. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00646. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Eliminating Daily Shifts, Tattoos, and Skin Marks: Streamlining Isocenter Localization With Treatment Plan Embedded Couch Values for External Beam Radiation Therapy.
消除日常班次、纹身和皮肤标记：通过将治疗计划嵌入式治疗床值用于外照射放射治疗，简化等中心定位。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan;9(1):e110-e117. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
4
Effectiveness and limitations of an incident-reporting system analyzed by local clinical safety leaders in a tertiary hospital: Prospective evaluation through real-time observations of patient safety incidents.一家三级医院的当地临床安全负责人对事件报告系统的有效性和局限性进行分析：通过对患者安全事件的实时观察进行前瞻性评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12509. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012509.
5
Incident learning in radiation oncology: A review.放射肿瘤学中的事件学习：综述。
Med Phys. 2018 May;45(5):e100-e119. doi: 10.1002/mp.12800. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
6
Common error pathways seen in the RO-ILS data that demonstrate opportunities for improving treatment safety.在 RO-ILS 数据中观察到的常见错误途径，这些途径表明了提高治疗安全性的机会。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar-Apr;8(2):123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.10.007. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
7
Making Patient Safety Event Data Actionable: Understanding Patient Safety Analyst Needs.使患者安全事件数据具有可操作性：了解患者安全分析师的需求。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Sep 1;17(6):e509-e514. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000400.
8
The effectiveness of pretreatment physics plan review for detecting errors in radiation therapy.放疗前物理计划审核在检测放疗误差方面的有效性。
Med Phys. 2016 Sep;43(9):5181. doi: 10.1118/1.4961010.
9
Chemotherapy Errors: A Call for a Standardized Approach to Measurement and Reporting.化疗错误：呼吁采用标准化方法进行测量和报告。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Apr;12(4):e495-501. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008995. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
10
International recommendations for national patient safety incident reporting systems: an expert Delphi consensus-building process.国家患者安全事件报告系统的国际建议：专家德尔菲共识达成过程
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):150-163. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004456. Epub 2016 Feb 22.