Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Aug;50(8):671-676. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
The purpose of this study was to show the non-inferiority of [F]FDG-PET/CT compared with panendoscopy with regards to secondary malignancies of the UADT, and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PET/CT for detecting synchronous malignancies. Patients with newly diagnosed OSCC and both panendoscopy and [F]FDG-PET/CT at primary staging were enrolled in this retrospective study. The accuracy in detecting synchronous malignancies was assessed for both modalities, and their diagnostic measures for the detection of malignancies within the UADT were compared. Histopathological analysis and clinical follow-up served as reference standards. In total, 182 patients were enrolled in this study. Eighteen patients (9.9%) had in total 22 synchronous malignancies, of which eight were located within the UADT. [F]FDG-PET/CT detected all malignancies within the whole body (sensitivity: 100%) and yielded false-positive results in four cases (specificity: 97.6%). Sensitivity ([F]FDG-PET/CT: 100% vs panendoscopy: 87.5%), specificity (99.4% vs 100%), negative predictive value (100% vs 99.4%), and positive predictive value (88.9% vs 100%) for detecting secondary UADT malignancies did not differ between modalities (all p = 0.32). Within the limitations of the study it seems that [F]FDG-PET/CT detects synchronous malignancies of the UADT with an accuracy comparable to panendoscopy, and enables highly sensitive whole-body tumor screening in patients with newly diagnosed OSCC. This could be a relevant factor for therapeutic decision making in clinical routine.
本研究旨在证明 [F]FDG-PET/CT 在检测头颈部恶性肿瘤的次要恶性肿瘤方面不劣于全内镜检查,并评估 PET/CT 对检测同步恶性肿瘤的诊断性能。这项回顾性研究纳入了在初次分期时同时接受新诊断的口咽癌和全内镜检查以及 [F]FDG-PET/CT 检查的患者。评估了两种方法在检测同步恶性肿瘤方面的准确性,并比较了它们在检测头颈部恶性肿瘤方面的诊断措施。组织病理学分析和临床随访作为参考标准。共有 182 名患者纳入本研究。18 名患者(9.9%)共有 22 个同步恶性肿瘤,其中 8 个位于头颈部。[F]FDG-PET/CT 全身(敏感性:100%)均检测到所有恶性肿瘤,并在 4 例中产生假阳性结果(特异性:97.6%)。在检测头颈部继发恶性肿瘤方面,敏感性([F]FDG-PET/CT:100% 比全内镜检查:87.5%)、特异性(99.4% 比 100%)、阴性预测值(100% 比 99.4%)和阳性预测值(88.9% 比 100%)在两种方法之间无差异(均 p=0.32)。在研究的局限性内,[F]FDG-PET/CT 似乎可以与全内镜检查一样准确地检测头颈部的同步恶性肿瘤,并能对头颈部恶性肿瘤进行高度敏感的全身肿瘤筛查,这可能是临床常规中治疗决策的一个相关因素。