Liu Siping, Yang Fang, Chang Qingxian, Jia Bei, Xu Yushuang, Wu Ruifeng, Li Liyan, Chen Weishan, Yin Ailan, Huang Fodi, Feng Suxin, Li Fenxia
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Road No.1838, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Berry Genomics Corporation, Beijing, China.
Mol Cytogenet. 2022 Jul 6;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13039-022-00607-z.
Since 2011, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has undergone rapid expansion, with both utilization and coverage. However, conclusive data regarding the clinical validity and utility of this testing tool are lacking. Thus, there is a continued need to educate clinicians and patients about the current benefits and limitations in order to inform pre- and post-test counseling, pre/perinatal decision making, and medical risk assessment/management.
This retrospective study included women referred for invasive prenatal diagnosis to confirm positive NIPT results between January 2017 and December 2020. Prenatal diagnosis testing, including karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated.
In total, 468 women were recruited. The PPVs for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 were 86.1%, 57.8%, and 25.0%, respectively. The PPVs for rare chromosomal abnormalities (RCAs) and copy number variants (CNVs) were 17.0% and 40.4%, respectively. The detection of sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs) had a PPV of 20% for monosomy X, 23.5% for 47,XXX, 68.8% for 47,XXY, and 62.5% for 47,XYY. The high-risk groups had a significant increase in the number of true positive cases compared to the low- and moderate-risk groups.
T13, monosomy X, and RCA were associated with lower PPVs. The improvement of cell-free fetal DNA screening technology and continued monitoring of its performance are important.
自2011年以来,无创产前检测(NIPT)迅速发展,在应用率和覆盖率方面都有所提高。然而,关于这种检测工具的临床有效性和实用性的确定性数据仍然缺乏。因此,持续需要对临床医生和患者进行教育,使其了解当前的益处和局限性,以便为检测前和检测后咨询、产前/围产期决策以及医疗风险评估/管理提供信息。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2017年1月至2020年12月期间因无创产前检测结果呈阳性而转诊进行侵入性产前诊断的女性。进行了包括核型分析、染色体微阵列分析(CMA)在内的产前诊断检测。计算阳性预测值(PPV)。
共招募了468名女性。21三体、18三体和13三体的阳性预测值分别为86.1%、57.8%和25.0%。罕见染色体异常(RCA)和拷贝数变异(CNV)的阳性预测值分别为17.0%和40.4%。性染色体非整倍体(SCA)检测中,X单体的阳性预测值为20%,47,XXX为23.5%,47,XXY为68.8%,47,XYY为62.5%。与低风险和中等风险组相比,高风险组的真阳性病例数显著增加。
13三体、X单体和RCA与较低的阳性预测值相关。改进游离胎儿DNA筛查技术并持续监测其性能很重要。