Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023 Jun;132(6):628-637. doi: 10.1177/00034894221111254. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
Investigate the use of nasal endoscopy, sinus imaging, and neurologic evaluation in patients presenting to a rhinologist primarily for craniofacial pain.
This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive outpatients presenting to a rhinologist between 2016 and 2019 with chief complaints of craniofacial pain with or without other sinonasal symptoms, who were then referred to and evaluated by headache specialists. Data analyzed included sinusitis symptoms, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores (and facial pain subscores), pain location, nasal endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) findings, and headache diagnoses made by headache specialists.
Of the 134 patients with prominent craniofacial pain, the majority of patients were diagnosed with migraine (50%) or tension-type (22%) headache, followed by multiple other non-sinogenic headache disorders. Approximately 5% of patients had headaches attributed to sinusitis. Amongst all patients, 90% had negative nasal endoscopies. Patients with negative endoscopies were significantly less likely to report smell loss ( = .003) compared to those with positive endoscopies. Poor agreement was demonstrated between self-reported pain locations and sinus findings on CT (kappa values < 0.20). Negative nasal endoscopy showed high concurrence with negative CT findings (80%-97%).
Patients presenting with chief complaints of craniofacial pain generally met criteria for various non-sinogenic headache disorders. Nasal endoscopy was negative in 90% of patients, and CT demonstrated poor agreement with pain locations. Nasal endoscopy and CT shared high concurrence rates for negative sinus findings. The value of nasal endoscopy over sinus imaging in craniofacial pain evaluation should be explored in future studies.
调查在主要因颅面疼痛就诊的耳鼻喉科医生的患者中,使用鼻内窥镜、鼻窦成像和神经评估的情况。
这是对 2016 年至 2019 年期间因颅面疼痛(伴有或不伴有其他鼻窦症状)为主诉连续就诊的耳鼻喉科门诊患者进行的回顾性分析,随后由头痛专家进行转介和评估。分析的数据包括鼻窦炎症状、鼻-鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22)评分(和面部疼痛亚评分)、疼痛部位、鼻内窥镜检查、计算机断层扫描(CT)结果以及头痛专家做出的头痛诊断。
在 134 例颅面疼痛明显的患者中,大多数患者被诊断为偏头痛(50%)或紧张型(22%)头痛,其次是其他多种非鼻窦性头痛疾病。约 5%的患者头痛归因于鼻窦炎。在所有患者中,90%的鼻内窥镜检查结果为阴性。与内窥镜检查阳性的患者相比,内窥镜检查阴性的患者报告嗅觉丧失的可能性显著降低(= .003)。自我报告的疼痛部位与 CT 上的鼻窦发现之间显示出较差的一致性(kappa 值 < 0.20)。阴性鼻内窥镜检查与阴性 CT 结果具有高度一致性(80%-97%)。
主诉颅面疼痛的患者通常符合各种非鼻窦性头痛疾病的标准。90%的患者鼻内窥镜检查结果为阴性,CT 与疼痛部位的一致性较差。鼻内窥镜检查和 CT 对阴性鼻窦发现的一致性较高。在未来的研究中,应探讨鼻内窥镜检查在颅面疼痛评估中的价值是否超过鼻窦成像。