• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项判决被推翻:我们是否已黔驴技穷?

A Verdict Overturned: Are We at Our Wit's End?

机构信息

PLAKUN: Medical Director/CEO, The Austen Riggs Center, Stockbridge, MA; and Founder, American Psychiatric Association Psychotherapy Caucus, Washington, DC.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Pract. 2022 Jul 1;28(4):324-327. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000643.

DOI:10.1097/PRA.0000000000000643
PMID:35797689
Abstract

Despite the 2008 Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, access to psychotherapy through health insurance is quite limited. The 2019 landmark verdict in Wit v. United Behavioral Health offered hope of change. This column describes the recent overturning of the verdict in Wit v. United Behavioral Health, efforts by the Plaintiffs' attorneys to pursue a review by the entire 29-member United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of the puzzling decision apparently based on a misunderstanding of the arguments of the case, and steps forward to implement the mental health parity law.

摘要

尽管有 2008 年的《精神健康和平等法案》和《成瘾公平法案》,但通过健康保险获得心理治疗的机会仍然非常有限。2019 年,Wit v. United Behavioral Health 的里程碑式判决带来了变革的希望。本专栏描述了 Wit v. United Behavioral Health 判决的最近推翻,原告律师努力让整个由 29 名成员组成的美国第九巡回上诉法院对这一令人费解的决定进行全面审查,该决定显然基于对案件论点的误解,以及为实施精神健康平权法而采取的措施。

相似文献

1
A Verdict Overturned: Are We at Our Wit's End?一项判决被推翻:我们是否已黔驴技穷?
J Psychiatr Pract. 2022 Jul 1;28(4):324-327. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000643.
2
Providing a Routine Medical Necessity Letter to Improve Access to Care for Our Patients.为改善患者的医疗服务可提供常规医疗必要性函。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2021 Jul 28;27(4):288-295. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000563.
3
Improving Access to Psychotherapy: Implications of Wit Versus United Behavioral Health.改善心理治疗的可及性:Wit 与 United Behavioral Health 的影响。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2021 May 5;27(3):199-202. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000541.
4
Appeals court says AIDS caps by insurers do not violate ADA.上诉法院称保险公司对艾滋病的限制并不违反《美国残疾人法案》。
AIDS Policy Law. 1999 Jun 25;14(12):1, 10-1.
5
Appeals court finds Utah late abortion restrictions unconstitutional.上诉法院裁定犹他州晚期堕胎限制违宪。
Reprod Freedom News. 1995 Sep 15;4(16):2.
6
Supreme Court refuses to review clinic access law; Second Appeals Court upholds statute.最高法院拒绝复审诊所准入法;第二上诉法院维持该法规。
Reprod Freedom News. 1995 Jun 30;4(13):2-3.
7
Another Step Toward Implementing Mental Health Parity.迈向实现精神健康平权的又一步。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2021 Nov 5;27(6):453-455. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000584.
8
A political history of federal mental health and addiction insurance parity.联邦精神健康和成瘾保险平权的政治历史。
Milbank Q. 2010 Sep;88(3):404-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00605.x.
9
Behavioral health insurance parity: does Oregon's experience presage the national experience with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act?行为健康保险平等待遇:俄勒冈州的经验是否预示着《精神健康和平等法案》在全国范围内的经验?
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;169(1):31-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020320. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
10
Supreme Court asked to examine legality of AIDS caps.最高法院被要求审查艾滋病防治上限的合法性。
AIDS Policy Law. 1999 Nov 26;14(21):1, 14.