Tilburg center for Cognition and Communication, Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, the Netherlands; Centre for Languages and Academic Skills, Faculty of Technolgoy, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, P.O. Box 5015, 2600 GA, Delft, the Netherlands.
Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192, Japan.
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Sep 9;174:108315. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108315. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
Co-speech hand gestures are an ubiquitous form of nonverbal communication, which can express additional information that is not present in speech. Hand gestures may become more relevant when verbal production is impaired, as in speakers with post-stroke aphasia. In fact, speakers with aphasia produce more gestures than non-brain damaged speakers. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that speakers with aphasia produce gestures that convey information essential to understand their communication. In the present study, we addressed the question whether these gestures catch the attention of their addressees. Healthy volunteers (observers) watched short video clips while their eye movements were recorded. These video clips featured speakers with aphasia and non-brain damaged speakers describing two different scenarios (buying a sweater or having witnessed an accident). Our results show that hand gestures produced by speakers with aphasia are on average attended to longer than gestures produced by non-brain damaged speakers. This effect was significant even when we controlled for the longer duration of the gestural movements in speakers with aphasia. Further, the amount of information in speech was also correlated with gesture attention. That is gestures produced by speakers with less informative speech were attended to more frequently. In conclusion, our findings suggest that listeners reallocate their attention and focus more strongly on non-verbal information from co-speech gestures if speech comprehension becomes challenging due to the speaker's verbal production deficits. These findings support a communicative function of co-speech gestures and advocate for instructing people with aphasia to communicate things in the form of gestures that cannot be expressed verbally because interlocutors take notice of these gestures.
伴随言语的手势是一种无处不在的非言语交流形式,它可以表达言语中没有的额外信息。当言语生成受损时,例如在患有中风后失语症的患者中,手势可能变得更加相关。事实上,患有失语症的患者比非大脑损伤的患者产生更多的手势。此外,有证据表明,患有失语症的患者会产生传达理解其交流信息至关重要的手势。在本研究中,我们探讨了这些手势是否能引起他们的听众的注意。健康志愿者(观察者)在观看短片时记录他们的眼动。这些视频片段展示了患有失语症和非大脑损伤的患者描述两个不同场景(购买毛衣或目睹事故)。我们的研究结果表明,患有失语症的患者产生的手势比非大脑损伤的患者产生的手势平均受到更多的关注。即使我们控制了患有失语症患者手势运动时间更长的因素,这种效果仍然显著。此外,言语中的信息量也与手势注意力相关。也就是说,言语信息量较少的患者产生的手势受到的关注更频繁。总之,我们的研究结果表明,如果由于说话者的言语生成缺陷而导致言语理解变得具有挑战性,听众会重新分配注意力并更强烈地关注伴随言语的手势中的非言语信息。这些发现支持了伴随言语手势的交际功能,并主张指导患有失语症的患者以不能用言语表达的方式通过手势来传达信息,因为对话者会注意到这些手势。