Department of Dentistry, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, the First People's Hospital of Changzhou, 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, 213000, People's Republic of China.
Head Face Med. 2022 Jul 7;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13005-022-00328-z.
To compare the efficacy of three surgically assisted permanent anterior tooth eruption methods (laser surgery, electrosurgery and routine surgery) in children.
Sixty-three orthodontic children with retarded permanent anterior tooth were selected and according to the random number table divided into three groups: laser surgery group (group A), electrosurgery group (group B) and routine surgery group (group C). The total operative time (min), the duration of pain after gingival excision (d), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain intensity scores (0-10 cm), and gingival healing time (d) were all recorded. Six months after treatment, periodontal indexes of the three groups, including gingival indexes (GI), plaque indexes (PLI), probing depth (PD) were checked by the same periodontist and recorded.
Surgical records showed that compared with group C, there were statistically significant differences in operative time, pain duration, pain intensity and healing time in group A and B (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in these four results between group A and group B. Periodontal examination indicators 6 months after surgery showed no statistical differences in GI, PLI and PD among group A, B and C. Oral clinical examination found that the three groups of patients with different treatment, dental eruption was normal.
All the three treatments can effectively solve the problem of delayed eruption of permanent anterior teeth in children. Particularly, laser surgery and high-frequency electrosurgery have good efficacy, little pain and high operability, which can be considered as a better method to aid teeth eruption.
比较三种手术辅助性恒牙永久萌出方法(激光手术、电外科手术和常规手术)在儿童中的疗效。
选择 63 例恒牙萌出延迟的正畸儿童,根据随机数字表法分为三组:激光手术组(A 组)、电外科手术组(B 组)和常规手术组(C 组)。记录总手术时间(min)、牙龈切除后疼痛持续时间(d)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛强度评分(0-10 cm)和牙龈愈合时间(d)。治疗 6 个月后,由同一位牙周病医生检查三组牙周指数,包括牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PLI)、探诊深度(PD)并记录。
手术记录显示,与 C 组相比,A 组和 B 组的手术时间、疼痛持续时间、疼痛强度和愈合时间均有统计学差异(P < 0.05)。A 组和 B 组在这四项结果上无显著差异。术后 6 个月牙周检查指标显示,A、B、C 三组的 GI、PLI 和 PD 无统计学差异。口腔临床检查发现,三组患者经不同治疗后,牙齿萌出均正常。
三种治疗方法均可有效解决儿童恒牙萌出延迟问题。特别是激光手术和高频电外科手术疗效好、疼痛小、操作性高,可作为辅助牙齿萌出的较好方法。