Sun Hao, Hu Rongdang, Ren Manman, Lin Yan, Wang Xiuying, Sun Chaofan, Wang Yi
a Resident Doctor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
b Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):768-74. doi: 10.2319/083015-584.1. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
To determine the timing of treatment for the labial inversely impacted maxillary central incisors.
Twenty-eight patients (mean age, 8.2 years) with labial inversely impacted maxillary central incisors were divided into early-treated and later-treated groups according to their dental age. All of the patients were treated with a combination of surgery and orthodontic traction using the Guide rod appliance. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken immediately after treatment for assessing the root morphology, root length, and alveolar bone loss. Sagittal slices were evaluated at the widest labial-lingual width of the tooth in the axial view. All variables were evaluated by Simplant 13.0 software (Materialise Dental NV, Leuven, Belgium).
The rank sum test indicated that the root length of two groups showed a statistically significant difference between the impacted and homonym tooth, with a shorter length in the impacted tooth (P < .05). The D-value (difference of root length between the impacted and homonym tooth) and alveolar bone loss on the labial side of the impacted incisor are significantly less in the early-treated groups when compared with the later-treated groups (P < .05). Spearman rank correlation analysis showed a statistically positive association between the treatment timing and D-value (r = .623, P < .05). The chi-square test for morphology of root apex indicated that the incidence of the root-apex-directed labial side is significantly higher in the later-treated groups when compared with the early-treated groups.
The labial inversely impacted maxillary central incisors should be treated early to promote root development by achieving a better morphology of root apex, thus reducing the risk of alveolar bone loss on the labial side.
确定唇侧倒置阻生上颌中切牙的治疗时机。
将28例(平均年龄8.2岁)唇侧倒置阻生上颌中切牙患者根据其牙龄分为早期治疗组和晚期治疗组。所有患者均采用导杆矫治器联合手术及正畸牵引进行治疗。治疗后立即拍摄锥形束计算机断层扫描图像,以评估牙根形态、牙根长度和牙槽骨吸收情况。在轴向视图中,于牙齿唇舌径最宽处评估矢状切片。所有变量均使用Simplant 13.0软件(比利时鲁汶Materialise Dental NV公司)进行评估。
秩和检验表明,两组患牙与同名牙的牙根长度差异有统计学意义,患牙牙根长度较短(P <.05)。与晚期治疗组相比,早期治疗组患牙的D值(患牙与同名牙牙根长度之差)及患牙唇侧牙槽骨吸收明显更少(P <.05)。Spearman等级相关分析显示治疗时机与D值之间存在统计学正相关(r = 0.623,P <.05)。根尖形态的卡方检验表明,与早期治疗组相比,晚期治疗组根尖向唇侧的发生率明显更高。
唇侧倒置阻生上颌中切牙应尽早治疗,以通过获得更好的根尖形态促进牙根发育,从而降低唇侧牙槽骨吸收的风险。