Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2022 Aug 1;29(4):350-360. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000749.
This review article presents the most recent research on bone fragility in individuals with diabetes from a medical imaging perspective.
The widespread availability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and trabecular bone score (TBS) software has led to recent assessments of bone fragility with this texture parameter in several studies of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), but in few of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Although most studies show a trend of reduced TBS values in T2D independent of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the lumbar spine, some studies also show the limitations of TBS in both T2D and T1D. Given the limitations of DXA to assess bone strength and investigate the etiology of bone fragility in diabetes, more investigators are incorporating three-dimensional (3D) medical imaging techniques in their studies. Recent use of 3D medical imaging to assess bone fragility in the setting of diabetes has been mostly limited to a few cross-sectional studies predominantly incorporating high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Although HR-pQCT studies indicate higher tibial cortical porosity in subjects with T2D, results are inconsistent in T1D due to differences in study designs, sample sizes, and subject characteristics, among other factors. With respect to central CT, recent studies support a previous finding in the literature indicating femoral neck geometrical impairments in subjects with T2D and provide encouraging results for the incorporation of finite element analysis (FEA) to assess bone strength in studies of T2D. In the recent literature, there are no studies assessing bone fragility in T1D with QCT, and only two studies used pQCT reporting tibial and radial impairments in young women and children with T1D, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been recently used in diabetic studies of bone fragility.
As bone fragility in diabetes is not explained by DXA-derived aBMD and given the limitations of cross-sectional studies, it is imperative to use 3D imaging techniques for longitudinal assessments of the density, quality, and microenvironment of bone to improve our understanding of the effects of diabetes on bone and reduce the risk of fracture in this large and vulnerable population of subjects with diabetes.
本文从医学影像学的角度,呈现了糖尿病患者骨脆弱性的最新研究进展。
双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)和骨小梁评分(TBS)软件的广泛应用,使得近年来在 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的多项研究中,都可以利用这一纹理参数进行骨脆弱性评估,但在 1 型糖尿病(T1D)中很少使用。尽管大多数研究显示,无论腰椎的面积骨密度(aBMD)如何,T2D 患者的 TBS 值都有降低的趋势,但也有一些研究显示 TBS 在 T2D 和 T1D 中都存在局限性。鉴于 DXA 在评估骨强度和研究糖尿病患者骨脆弱性病因方面的局限性,更多的研究者将三维(3D)医学成像技术纳入其研究中。最近,在糖尿病患者中使用 3D 医学成像技术来评估骨脆弱性的研究,大多仅限于少数使用高分辨率外周定量计算机断层扫描(HR-pQCT)的横断面研究。尽管 HR-pQCT 研究表明 T2D 患者的胫骨皮质骨孔隙率较高,但由于研究设计、样本量和受试者特征等因素的不同,T1D 患者的结果并不一致。至于中央 CT,最近的研究支持文献中之前的一项发现,即 T2D 患者的股骨颈几何结构受损,并为在 T2D 研究中采用有限元分析(FEA)评估骨强度提供了令人鼓舞的结果。在最近的文献中,没有研究使用 QCT 评估 T1D 患者的骨脆弱性,只有两项研究使用 pQCT 分别报告了年轻女性和儿童 T1D 患者的胫骨和桡骨受损情况。磁共振成像(MRI)在最近的糖尿病骨脆弱性研究中尚未使用。
由于糖尿病患者的骨脆弱性不能用 DXA 得出的 aBMD 来解释,而且横断面研究也存在局限性,因此必须使用 3D 成像技术进行密度、质量和骨微环境的纵向评估,以提高我们对糖尿病对骨的影响的认识,并降低这一庞大且脆弱的糖尿病患者群体发生骨折的风险。