Nissen Nina, Rossau Henriette Knold, Pilegaard Marc Sampedro, la Cour Karen
Nithackstrasse, Berlin 10585, Germany.
REHPA - Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Nyborg, Denmark.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Jun 30;16:26323524221097982. doi: 10.1177/26323524221097982. eCollection 2022.
Despite a tax-funded, needs-based organisation of the Danish health system, social inequality in cancer rehabilitation and palliative care (PC) has been noted repeatedly. Little is known about how best to improve access and participation in cancer rehabilitation and PC for socio-economically disadvantaged and socially vulnerable patients.
To gather, synthesise and describe practice-orientated development studies presented in Danish-language publications and examine the underpinning conceptualisations of social inequality and vulnerability; explore related views of stakeholders working in the field.
The study comprised a narrative review of Danish-language literature on practice-orientated development studies which address social inequality and vulnerability in cancer rehabilitation and PC and an online stakeholder consultation workshop with Danish professionals and academics working in the field.
Two themes characterise the included publications ( = 8): types of interventions; conceptualisations of social inequality and vulnerability; three themes were identified in the workshop data: focus and type of interventions; organisation of cancer care; and vulnerability of the healthcare system. The publications and the workshop participants ( = 12) favoured approaches which provide additional individualised resources throughout the cancer trajectory for this patient group. The terms social inequality and social vulnerability are largely used interchangeably, and associated with low income and no or little education yet qualified with multiple descriptors, which reflect the diverse socio-economic situations professionals encounter in cancer patients and their psychosocial needs.
Addressing social inequality and vulnerability in cancer rehabilitation and PC in Denmark entails practical and conceptual challenges. Of importance is individualised support and the integration of rehabilitation and PC into standardised care pathways. To conceive of social vulnerability as a layered, dynamic, relational and contextual concept reflects current practice in identifying the diversity of cancer patients who may benefit from additional support in accessing and participating in rehabilitation and PC.
尽管丹麦医疗系统是基于需求由税收资助的组织形式,但癌症康复和姑息治疗(PC)中的社会不平等现象仍屡有报道。对于如何最好地改善社会经济弱势和社会脆弱患者获得癌症康复和PC服务的机会以及参与度,我们知之甚少。
收集、综合并描述丹麦语出版物中呈现的以实践为导向的发展研究,并审视社会不平等和脆弱性的相关概念;探讨该领域利益相关者的相关观点。
该研究包括对丹麦语文献中关于以实践为导向的发展研究的叙述性综述,这些研究涉及癌症康复和PC中的社会不平等和脆弱性,以及与丹麦该领域的专业人员和学者进行的在线利益相关者咨询研讨会。
纳入的出版物(n = 8)有两个主题特征:干预类型;社会不平等和脆弱性的概念;在研讨会数据中确定了三个主题:干预的重点和类型;癌症护理的组织;以及医疗系统的脆弱性。出版物和研讨会参与者(n = 12)倾向于在整个癌症病程中为该患者群体提供额外个性化资源的方法。社会不平等和社会脆弱性这两个术语在很大程度上可以互换使用,并且与低收入以及没有或几乎没有受过教育相关,但有多个描述符对其进行限定,这反映了专业人员在癌症患者中遇到的不同社会经济状况及其心理社会需求。
解决丹麦癌症康复和PC中的社会不平等和脆弱性问题存在实际和概念上的挑战。重要的是个性化支持以及将康复和PC纳入标准化护理路径。将社会脆弱性概念化为一个分层的、动态的、关系性的和情境性的概念,反映了当前在识别可能从获得和参与康复及PC的额外支持中受益的癌症患者多样性方面的实践。