Khan Zahid
Cardiology and General Medicine, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Cardiology, Royal Free Hospital, London, GBR.
Cureus. 2022 May 30;14(5):e25483. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25483. eCollection 2022 May.
A 51-year-old patient was admitted with chest pain and broad complex ventricular tachycardia. He received three consecutive direct cardioversion (DC) shocks and was commenced on amiodarone infusion via a central venous catheter or central line (CVC). He responded to treatment and normal sinus rhythm (NSR) was achieved. He had elevated troponin I and underwent coronary angiogram which initially was thought to be responsible for his ventricular tachycardia. Coronary angiogram (CAG) showed unobstructed coronary arteries. He was recently diagnosed with pheochromocytoma and was commenced on Phenoxybenzamine 10 mg two months back. He developed ventricular tachycardia (VT) again the next day that did not respond to four consecutive direct cardioversion shocks (DC) and antiarrhythmic medications. He was intubated and ventilated to terminate his VT and was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). He remained intubated for 48 hours and he remained in NSR, after which he was extubated. He was commenced on bisoprolol and was later stepped down to the coronary care unit (CCU). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) showed left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) or possibly myocarditis in view of patient's known history of pheochromocytoma. He was discussed with surgical team at another hospital for surgical resection of the adrenal tumor and had a few further runs of VT while he was waiting to be transferred. The patient finally underwent surgical resection of the tumor and was booked for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in view of his VT. This was an interesting case of treatment-resistant VT driven by pheochromocytoma and LVNC, and it is important to be familiar with the fact that conventional therapies may fail in these patients and may require intubation and ventilation to terminate VT storms.
一名51岁的患者因胸痛和宽QRS波群室性心动过速入院。他接受了三次连续的直接电复律(DC)电击,并通过中心静脉导管或中心静脉置管(CVC)开始输注胺碘酮。他对治疗有反应,恢复了正常窦性心律(NSR)。他的肌钙蛋白I升高,并接受了冠状动脉造影,最初认为这是导致他室性心动过速的原因。冠状动脉造影(CAG)显示冠状动脉通畅。他最近被诊断为嗜铬细胞瘤,两个月前开始服用酚苄明10毫克。第二天,他再次出现室性心动过速(VT),对连续四次直接电复律电击(DC)和抗心律失常药物均无反应。他被插管并进行机械通气以终止室性心动过速,随后被转入重症监护病房(ICU)。他插管48小时,之后恢复窦性心律,随后拔除气管插管。他开始服用比索洛尔,后来转入冠心病监护病房(CCU)。鉴于患者已知的嗜铬细胞瘤病史,心脏磁共振成像(CMR)显示左心室心肌致密化不全(LVNC)或可能为心肌炎。他在另一家医院与外科团队讨论了肾上腺肿瘤的手术切除问题,在等待转院期间又多次出现室性心动过速。鉴于他的室性心动过速,患者最终接受了肿瘤手术切除,并预约植入植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)。这是一例由嗜铬细胞瘤和左心室心肌致密化不全引起的难治性室性心动过速的有趣病例,重要的是要认识到在这些患者中传统治疗可能会失败,可能需要插管和机械通气来终止室性心动过速风暴。