Heart & Vascular Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar;23(3):296-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02183.x. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
Patients with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and ventricular arrhythmias leading to ICD therapies have poor clinical outcomes and quality of life. Antiarrhythmic agents and catheter ablation are needed to control these arrhythmias. Dofetilide has only been approved for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. The role of dofetilide in the control of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with an ICD has not been established.
Evaluate the safety and efficacy of dofetilide in a consecutive group of patients with an ICD and recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/ or ventricular fibrillation (VF) after other antiarrhythmic drugs have failed to suppress these arrhythmias.
We studied 30 patients (age 59 ± 11; 5 women) with symptomatic VT or VF and ICDs for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. These patients had an average of 1.8 ± 4.5 episodes of VT/VF per month despite antiarrhymic therapy. Twenty-one patients (70%) had recurrent appropriate ICD therapies prior to initiation of dofetilide, and 9 (30%) VTs below the programmed detection rate of the ICD. Twenty-three patients (77%) had coronary artery disease. Mean ejection fraction was 30 ± 14% and 26/30 (87%) had congestive heart failure. All patients had previously failed 2 ± 1 antiarrhythmic drugs including amiodarone (n = 19) and sotalol (n = 10).
During the first month of treatment, 25 patients (83%) had complete suppression of VT/VF and of the 21 patients with ICD therapies 16 (76%) had no therapies during the first month of treatment. During a follow-up period of 32 ± 32 months, dofetilide reduced the monthly episodes of VT/VF from 1.8 ± 4.5 to 1.0 ± 3.5 (P = 0.006). Monthly ICD therapies decreased from 0.9 ± 1.4 to 0.4 ± 1.7 (P = 0.037). In 9 patients that presented with slow VTs under the ICD detection zone, dofetilide reduced monthly VT/VF episodes from 0.7 ± 0.6 to 0.1 ± 0.1 (P = 0.01) and 6 (67%) had no further ICD therapies. Dofetilide was discontinued in 13 patients (43%) after 24 ± 30 months due to failure to control VT/VF (n = 7), placement of a left ventricular assist device (n = 3), catheter ablation (n = 1), heart transplantation (n = 1), and left ventricular restoration surgery (n = 1). There were 7 documented deaths (2 patients died suddenly; 3 patients of progressive heart failure; and 2 of non-cardiac causes).
In patients with an ICD and ventricular arrhythmias, dofetilide decreases the frequency of VT/VF and ICD therapies even when other antiarrhythmic agents, including amiodarone, have previously been ineffective. Recurrences still occur in some patients requiring catheter ablation, mechanical support, or heart transplantation.
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者发生导致 ICD 治疗的室性心律失常时,临床结局和生活质量较差。需要使用抗心律失常药物和导管消融来控制这些心律失常。多非利特仅被批准用于治疗心房颤动。多非利特在控制 ICD 患者室性心律失常中的作用尚未确定。
评估多非利特在其他抗心律失常药物未能抑制心律失常后,连续一组患有 ICD 和复发性室性心动过速(VT)和/或室颤(VF)的患者中的安全性和疗效。
我们研究了 30 名患有症状性 VT 或 VF 和 ICD 的患者,这些患者因继发性预防心源性猝死而接受 ICD 治疗。尽管进行了抗心律失常治疗,这些患者每月平均有 1.8 ± 4.5 次 VT/VF 发作。在开始使用多非利特之前,有 21 名患者(70%)有过复发性适当的 ICD 治疗,9 名患者(30%)的 VTs 低于 ICD 的程控检测率。23 名患者(77%)患有冠状动脉疾病。平均射血分数为 30 ± 14%,26/30(87%)有充血性心力衰竭。所有患者均曾使用 2 ± 1 种抗心律失常药物治疗失败,包括胺碘酮(n = 19)和索他洛尔(n = 10)。
在治疗的第一个月,25 名患者(83%)VT/VF 完全得到抑制,在 21 名有 ICD 治疗的患者中,有 16 名(76%)在治疗的第一个月内没有治疗。在 32 ± 32 个月的随访期间,多非利特使每月 VT/VF 发作次数从 1.8 ± 4.5 降至 1.0 ± 3.5(P = 0.006)。每月 ICD 治疗次数从 0.9 ± 1.4 降至 0.4 ± 1.7(P = 0.037)。在 9 名以 ICD 检测区域下出现缓慢 VTs 的患者中,多非利特使每月 VT/VF 发作次数从 0.7 ± 0.6 降至 0.1 ± 0.1(P = 0.01),其中 6 名(67%)不再需要 ICD 治疗。在 24 ± 30 个月后,由于 VT/VF 控制失败(n = 7)、左心室辅助装置植入(n = 3)、导管消融(n = 1)、心脏移植(n = 1)和左心室修复手术(n = 1),13 名患者(43%)停用了多非利特。有 7 例记录的死亡(2 例患者猝死;3 例患者因进行性心力衰竭;2 例患者因非心脏原因)。
在患有 ICD 和室性心律失常的患者中,即使其他抗心律失常药物(包括胺碘酮)先前无效,多非利特也可降低 VT/VF 和 ICD 治疗的频率。一些患者仍需要导管消融、机械支持或心脏移植才能复发。