Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):e331-e341. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005477. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
To review quality of life (QOL) instruments for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients and informal carers, and their use in QOL and cost-utility analysis (CUA) studies.
CLTI is a global health problem with significant morbidity affecting patients and informal carers. QOL is increasingly measured for holistic outcomes assessment and CUA. However, measurement instruments in CLTI are poorly understood.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, COSMIN, PROQOLID, CEA registry, and NHS EED databases were searched for all English language studies up to May 2021. Features of instruments, evidence of measurement property appraisal, and trends in use were assessed. Prospective protocol registration (Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KNG9U ).
A total of 146 studies on QOL instruments (n=43), QOL outcomes (n=97), and CUA (n=9) were included. Four disease-specific QOL instruments are available for lower extremity arterial disease (intermittent claudication or CLTI). VascuQoL-25 and VascuQoL-6 have been used in CLTI. There is no CLTI-specific instrument. Of 14 generic instruments, SF-36, EQ-5D-3L, NHP, and WHOQOL-BREF were most common. Studies reporting partial measurement property appraisal favored VascuQoL-25, VascuQoL-6, and SF-36. Feasibility considerations include mode of administration and responder burden. None of 4 available carer-specific instruments have been used in CLTI. Since 1992, the number of QOL studies has increased considerably, but CUA studies are scarce. Informal carers have not been assessed.
This review provides a comprehensive reference for QOL measurement in CLTI that helps end-users with instrument selection, use, and interpretation. However, a CLTI-specific instrument is needed. There is an opportunity to benefit society through future CUA studies and evaluation of QOL in informal carers.
回顾慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者和非专业护理人员的生活质量(QOL)工具,并评估其在 QOL 和成本效用分析(CUA)研究中的应用。
CLTI 是一种全球性健康问题,发病率高,严重影响患者和非专业护理人员。QOL 越来越多地用于全面的结果评估和 CUA。然而,CLTI 中的测量工具还了解甚少。
在 2021 年 5 月之前,使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、COSMIN、PROQOLID、CEA 注册处和 NHS EED 数据库搜索所有英文语言的研究。评估工具的特点、测量属性评估的证据以及使用趋势。前瞻性方案注册(Open Science Framework:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KNG9U)。
共纳入 146 项关于 QOL 工具(n=43)、QOL 结果(n=97)和 CUA(n=9)的研究。有 4 种用于下肢动脉疾病(间歇性跛行或 CLTI)的疾病特异性 QOL 工具。VascuQoL-25 和 VascuQoL-6 已用于 CLTI。没有 CLTI 专用工具。在 14 种通用工具中,SF-36、EQ-5D-3L、NHP 和 WHOQOL-BREF 最为常见。报告部分测量属性评估的研究倾向于使用 VascuQoL-25、VascuQoL-6 和 SF-36。可行性考虑因素包括管理模式和响应者负担。在 CLTI 中尚未使用 4 种可用的护理人员专用工具。自 1992 年以来,QOL 研究的数量大幅增加,但 CUA 研究却很少。尚未评估非专业护理人员。
本综述为 CLTI 中的 QOL 测量提供了全面的参考,有助于最终用户选择、使用和解释工具。但是,需要一种 CLTI 专用工具。通过未来的 CUA 研究和对非专业护理人员 QOL 的评估,为社会带来益处的机会。