Belov D F, Nikolaenko V P
Saint Petersburg Multifield Hospital No. 2, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Vestn Oftalmol. 2022;138(3):24-28. doi: 10.17116/oftalma202213803124.
To develop an alternative method of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes with mature cataract and axial length (AL) of less than 22.0 mm using modern formulas Barrett Universal II and Hill RBF.
The study enrolled 41 patients (41 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification (PE). Ultrasound biometry (Tomey Biometer Al-100) and keratometry (Topcon-8800) were used for IOL power calculation by SRK/T and Haigis formulas. To calculate IOL power by Barrett Universal II and Hill RBF formulas, 0.2 mm were added to AL measured with ultrasonography (retinal thickness). One month after PE, spherical equivalent of refraction was compared with target refraction (calculated by the formulas listed above), and based on that a conclusion was made on the accuracy of calculations.
Haigis formula was found to be the least accurate (IOL calculation error -0.39±0.79 D). The calculation error in SRK/T (0.04±0.79 D), Barrett Universal II (0.02±0.79 D) and Hill RBF (-0.05±0.73 D) formulas was much lower. However, among them Hill RBF had the lowest spread of the mean absolute IOL calculation error. Pairwise comparison revealed significant difference of mean IOL calculation error by Haigis formula versus the others. There was no significant difference in the following pairs: SRK/T - Barrett Universal II (=0.855), and SRK/T - Hill RBF (=0.167), but there was a significant difference (=0.043) in the Barrett Universal II - Hill RBF pairdue to the tendency for slight hypermetropic calculation error in the former and the inherent slight myopic shift in the latter..
The proposed alternative method of IOL power calculation in eyes with mature cataract and short AL using modern formulas (Barrett Universal II and Hill RBF) shows higher accuracy compared to the formulas embedded in ultrasound biometer (SRK/T and Haigis), and can be recommended for use in everyday practice.
使用现代公式Barrett Universal II和Hill RBF,开发一种用于计算成熟白内障且眼轴长度(AL)小于22.0 mm的眼睛的人工晶状体(IOL)度数的替代方法。
该研究纳入了41例行超声乳化白内障吸除术(PE)的患者(41只眼)。使用超声生物测量仪(Tomey Biometer Al-100)和角膜曲率计(Topcon-8800)通过SRK/T和Haigis公式计算IOL度数。为了通过Barrett Universal II和Hill RBF公式计算IOL度数,将超声测量的AL(视网膜厚度)增加0.2 mm。PE术后1个月,将等效球镜度与目标屈光度(通过上述公式计算)进行比较,并据此得出计算准确性的结论。
发现Haigis公式的准确性最低(IOL计算误差为-0.39±0.79 D)。SRK/T(0.04±0.79 D)、Barrett Universal II(0.02±0.79 D)和Hill RBF(-0.05±0.73 D)公式的计算误差要低得多。然而,其中Hill RBF的平均绝对IOL计算误差分布最低。两两比较显示,Haigis公式与其他公式的平均IOL计算误差存在显著差异。以下几组之间无显著差异:SRK/T - Barrett Universal II(=0.855),以及SRK/T - Hill RBF(=0.167),但Barrett Universal II - Hill RBF组存在显著差异(=0.043),原因是前者有轻微远视性计算误差的趋势,而后者有固有的轻微近视偏移。
所提出的使用现代公式(Barrett Universal II和Hill RBF)计算成熟白内障且眼轴短的眼睛的IOL度数的替代方法,与超声生物测量仪中嵌入的公式(SRK/T和Haigis)相比,显示出更高的准确性,可推荐用于日常实践。